Check out this video.?

https://youtu.be/ov2qZFRlSPI?si=XFVYIr9jp1cA7Oj5

Now tell me it’s for peace.

The organization was to serves as a system of collective security, whereby its independent member states agree to mutual defence in response to an attack by any outside party.

This is enshrined in Article 5 of the treaty, which states that an armed attack against one member shall be considered an attack against them all.

Opposition to NATO tends to mainly come from pacifist organizations, workers movements, environmental groups and green parties, and socialist/communist political parties.

Many of them believe NATO to be antithetical to global peace and stability, environmentally destructive, and an obstacle to nuclear disarmament.

Since NATO’s creation in 1949, France has consistently maintained its membership in both political and military spheres.

However, it has frequently criticized NATO’s operational methods, particularlyu u the dominant role of the United States within the alliance.

I have never understood the logic of why many people say that ukraine joining NATO shouldn’t cause russia any concern.

Many say that it’s a strictly defensive organisation, even though time and time again, there has been many instances where NATO was “defending” themselvesv (Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, Libya).

I say, those examples are clearly proof that NATO isn’t just a defensive organisation, and that Putin’s worries against Ukraine joining NATO, is infact, justified.

This of course doesn’t mean that Putin’s murder of civilians is justified, just that the US shouldn’t have disregarded Russia’s complaints against the expansion of NATO.

NATO countries aren’t required to participate in a non-defensive operation.

Meanwhile, not being part of NATO does not preclude a state from working with a NATO country or launching offensives. 

Up to now the alliance itself is not a threat to Russia itself.

NATO has never fought a conventional interstate war, let alone annexed anyone’s territory.

I still don’t understand the logic of “NATO is harmless.

NATO is absolutely not an offensive organization and there’s absolutely no reason to believe that Russia would be at risk if Ukraine joined.

Putin absolutely does not believe that.

What he DOES believe is that it would be much harder to reassemble the USSR (his stated goal) if Ukraine is in NATO.

Don’t fall for the bold face lies.

Russia is NOT worried about Nato, Russia needs Nato as the bogeyman to keep their population united against this supposed monster that is coming to get them.

If Russia weren´t a threath to their neighbors, no former Soviet state would´ve joined Nato. 

In this very fucked world NATO finds itself in a quagmire of political forces that it has no control over

In this world NATO is literally a ticking bomb.

Who decides the future of the human race?

Will not be the Donald Trump of this world , or a Putin’s, or a nuclear bomb.

It’s no longer living behind a fortress that will save the world.

Perhaps climate change will give us a hand in deciding who or what will trigger the next war.

All human comments appreciated. All like

clicks and abuse chucked in the bin.

Contact: bobdillon33@gmail.com

https://youtube.com/watch?v=7hBMbQ9de1g&si=ce-c1gYbUdRbnFSO