Tags
Algorithms., Artificial Intelligence., Capitalism and Greed, CORONA VIRUS., Coronavirus (COVID-19), Technology, The Future of Mankind, TRACKING., Visions of the future.
(Two-minute depressing read)
This is a very dangerous situation.
With the economies melting all around the world, countries nearing bankruptcy, the world is becoming ripe for a one-world currency, controlled by unregulated AI tracking.
We are still living as if nothing is going to happen and losing sight of what is important.
If we are not vigilant COVID -19 is going to turn us all into trackable slaves with no recourse as to who, what, or how, any of this collected information is used.
We have been so conditioned by television, the internet, smartphone, magazines, billboards, etc, we are inclined to just take things for granted.
Of course, we still have a right to our own opinions.
However, with a blink of an eye, our world is changing.
Are we about to see the end of the covetous age when people thought about ME, ME, ME!.
Because tracking data is going to create a world of the Have and Have not.
Why?
Whatever about you I don’t want to live in a world of Social Stratification. In a society that is categorized into groups of people depending on whether they are COVID_19 free or not.
IT IS BAD ENOUGH AS IT IS WITH RACISM, RELIGIOUS BIGOTRY, WALL BUILDING, ETC.
We have for years listened to the current rhetoric that deals with wealth alone creating preconceived notions surrounding those of lower socioeconomic class.
We hear about wealth inequality, and lawmakers push policies designed to redistribute wealth, usually by increasing taxes on the successful to support programs for those that have less. Redistributing that wealth doesn’t help solve the issue because it destroys the very thing you are trying to preserve, the focus should be the equality of ability and opportunity.
The 1 percent vs. the 99 percent.
Either way, the theme is simple: Someone has something, and others don’t.
All of this is going to get worse if we allow unregulated tracking which will result in a world where everyone is afraid of commitment.
With the coming, economic depression I don’t want to live in a world of ignorance before the Next Pandemic arrives.
What is needed is more transparency not less so we can know that the second coming is ‘at the door.’
So what if anything should we be doing. What is needed is a de stimulating package to secure the future.
We should as it is obvious to be reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
We should be preparing for the impacts of climate change.
We should be restoring the vitality of natural systems
We should be increasing local, regional, and national self-sufficiency.
We should be developing a circular economy.
We should be more socially responsible.
We should be all working together.
We should be achieving all of them at the same time.
We should not have a mindset of we’ll do whatever it takes.
We should not allow the introduction of unregulated tracking. 
I can hear you saying that we are all already tracked.
This is true and perhaps a well-designed tool could offer public health benefits, but a poorly designed one could pose unnecessary and significant risks to privacy, civil rights, and civil liberties.
For there to be trust.
The tool must protect privacy, be voluntary, and store data on an individual’s device rather than in a centralized repository.
Even then there will still need to be strict policies to mitigate against overreach and abuse.
The data should not be used for purposes other than public health — not for advertising and especially not for any punitive or law enforcement purposes.
Rather than identify the people who own the phones, apps based on the protocol could use identifiers that cannot easily be traced back to phone owners.
Then how does the tool define an epidemiologically relevant “contact”?
The public needs to know if it is a good technological approximation of what public health professionals believe is a concern. Otherwise, the tool could be collecting far more personal information than is warranted by the crisis or could cause too many false alarms.
Another issue is whether phone users control when to submit their proximity logs for publication to the exposure database.
Also, when users share their proximity logs, what will they reveal?
Both the technology and related policies and procedures should ensure the deletion of data when there is no longer a need to hold it. To ensure tracking does not outlive the effort against COVID-19.
When people feel that their phones are antagonistic rather than helpful, they will just turn location functions off or turn their phones off entirely.
In the coming weeks and months, we are going to see a push to reopen the economy — an effort that will rely heavily on public health measures that include contact tracing.
Obviously, you’d have absolutely no civil liberties, freedoms, or powers, if you are deceased.
The COVID-19, however, has set in motion a paradigm shift in how nations prioritize and conceptualize personal freedom. So if the virus weren’t scary enough, its potential ramifications for privacy and civil liberties make it even scarier.
We all live here because Earth is the only planet known to humans that sustain life.
The signs of the end are prevalent.
I think it’s time that more people open their eyes to the problems of our society and acknowledge that we do, in fact, have a problem.
Yet these impacts will be trivial compared to the likely economic and social disruption if we continue to destroy the environment.
Short term thinking is prevailing. The sort of thinking that will condemn us to a very risky future.






The problem is that most people have no clear understanding of what civilization is or, perhaps as important, what it isn’t.
Wikipedia. According to this seemingly omniscient cyber-seer, civilization is defined most broadly as “any complex state-society characterized by a social hierarchy, symbolic communication forms (typically, writing systems), and a perceived separation from and domination over the natural environment”.
How many of us would fight for civilization if we thought that we were fighting for the increasing complexity of the state and its social hierarchy?
How many of the agrarians amongst us would fight for a civilization that defined itself as being separate from the natural environment and as seeking to dominate it?
How many of us would fight for incessant urbanization, centralization, and the passive domestication of ourselves alongside the domestication of other organisms?
How many of us had realized that being civilized was the willingness to make ourselves cattle in the service of increasingly complex social hierarchies?
How many of us thought that civilization was marked by the sort of “specialization of labour” that had reduced human work to that of a disposable cog in an increasingly large and complex mechanism?
How many of us guessed that civilization was defined by culturally ingrained progressivism and other supremacist ideologies?
How many of us perceived that taxation was civilized and that increasing taxation was therefore and presumably a mark of increasing civilization?
If this is civilization we would be justified in hoping that civilization would go to hell and that, indeed, we would be equally justified in believing that it was all too evidently going there.
However, it is still a helpful framework with which to view how humans come together and form a society.
All civilizations have certain characteristics. These include: (1) large population centres; (2) monumental architecture and unique art styles; (3) shared communication strategies; (4) systems for administering territories; (5) a complex division of labour; and (6) the division of people into social and economic classes.
Again according to Wikipedia, “civilization” is merely an ideological construct of the eighteenth century! It is not a reality in itself but an idea by which an irreligious and irrational “rationalism” can explain and explain away, to its own prejudiced satisfaction, the history of human culture.
This is how civilization is defined on the internet.
Is civilization worth defending?
Should we aim to conform to it so that we can be considered civilized?
Maggie Thatcher once said that there is no such thing as a society. How wrong she was
What is civilization? It is the conforming of the heart of humanity – equality for all.
Culture is everything about human society, i.e. it refers to the knowledge and features of a specific group of people living in a region.
Many forget that a culture is only as great as the rival cultures around it, and all history was written by the winners. So if we are to reinvent anything it won’t be civilisation, but the culture that makes us civilised that will have to change.
To do this we will have to ask what has been tried before and what the results were?
What resources are available, what new theories are there?
WE CAN’T CHANGE ANYTHING UNTILL EDUCATION/ HEALTH IS FREE FOR ALL.
WE CAN’T CHANGE ANYTHING TILL WE SHARE THE RICHES OF THE EARTH– FRESHWATER, FRESH AIR, GREEN ENERGY. ALL FOODS ARE NON-MODIFIED AND SOLD UNDER ITS NATURAL CONDITIONS.
WE CAN’T CHANGE ANYTHING UNLESS INEQUALITY DISAPPEARS. THE RICHEST 1% NOW OWN HALF OF THE WORLD’S WEALTH. THE GAP BETWEEN THE HAVES AND HAVE – NOT’S WHERE ONLY A FRACTION OF SOCIETY REAPS THE BENEFITS OF ECONOMIC GROWTH WILL HAVE TO BE TACKLED – THE BIFURCATED ECONOMY.
(Forty years of neoliberal policy means that wealthy individuals and large companies today have so much “surplus of capital” that they don’t know what to do with it. billions parkEed in tax havens.)
WE CAN’T CHANGE ANYTHING TILL RACISM AND RELIGIOUS BIGOTRY IS ABOLISHED
WE CAN’T CHANGE ANYTHING BY CREATING LOTTO MILLIONAIRES WHILE SLUMS EXIST.
WE CAN’T CHANGE ANYTHING WHILE THE ARMS INDUSTRY EXISTS.
WE CAN’T CHANGE ANYTHING WHILE SOVERGIN FUNDS EXIST.
WE CAN’T CHANGE ANYTHING WHILE PROFIT SEEKING ALGORITHMS EXIST.
WE CAN’T CHANGE ANYTHING TILL WE REALISE THAT EARTH COMES FIRST THEN ITS PEOPLE.
WE CAN’T CHANGE ANYTHING TILL WE ACT AS ONE.
WE CAN’T CHANGE ANYTHING TILL ALL WORLD DEBT IS WRITTEN OFF. TOTAL PUBLIC DEBT WILL BE IN THE TRILLIONS. WORLDWIDE, THE TOTAL MOUNTAIN OF DEBT HAS REACHED A RECORD AMOUNT OF 322% OF THE WORLD GDP.
WE CAN’T CHANGE ANYTHING TILL WE UNDERSTAND THAT ONE’S REACH MUST GO BEYOND ONE GRASP. THE CORONAVIRUS IS THE PERFECT TIME TO LAUNCH A NEW GREEN DEAL THAT IS AMBITIOUS ENOUGHT TO SAVE THE PLANET. NEVER MIND WORLD CONFERENCES TALKING ABOUT IT DO IT. THINK BIG. ACT NOW. TOGETHER.
WE CAN’T CHANGE ANYTHING UNTILL WE DO AWAY WITH DIVIDENDS AND REPLACE THEM WITH A BASIC LIVING INCOME.
WE CAN’T CHANGE ANYTHING UNLESS WE REFORM THE UNITED NATIONS REMOVE THE VETO AND TURN IT FROM A BEGGING SHOP TO A FULLY FUNDED ORGANISATION WITH A PERTUPITUAL INCOME FROM A 0.05% WORLD AID FUND. ( See previous posts.)
WE CAN’T CHANGE ANYTHING UNLESS WE CURBE CONSUMERISM AND MOVE TO SUSTAINABILITY. WE’VE CONSUMED BEYOND OUR MEANS FOR A GENERATION AND NOW THE BILL IS COMING DUE SUDDENLY.
WE CAN’T CHANGE ANYTHING WITH GDP AS OUR CULTURAL GOAL.
WE CAN’T CHANGE ANYTHING WHILE WE TOLERATE ZOMBIE BANKS. NO FEWER THAN 147 INDIVIDUAL NATIONAL BANKS CRISES ACCURED BETWEEN 1970 AND 2011 ACCORDING TO THE IMF. IT’S TIME TO PUT THE BANKING SYSTEM IN GOVERNMENT HANDS AND TO DISMANTLE CASION CAPITALISM.
My point is the pandemic and its aftermath will be super-consequential for how we live the rest of our lives. There will be implications across the board; for business, government, culture, sports and the arts, as well as behaviour.
It’s not too soon to think about that.
Smartphones have given us an always-on connection to the world’s information but history develops our researching skills and our understanding of human behaviour.
What we’ve done in the last generation is we’ve replaced normal human interactions and social capital with technology and money.
And we’ve done that with a deleterious impact on our health and our happiness because technology and money hijack our brains in a stronger way than slow, kind of boring conversations do and yet that’s our heritage.
Our culture is systems blind.
Monetary stability, public safety and all manner of civilised goals have grown too complicated and big. The idea of the trickle-down effect of the free capitalist market is no longer true it continually funnels things towards the top. It doesn’t speak to the bottom half of society now.
They say that the best things in life are free, that adage is only true if basic needs are covered. A lot of people are living paycheck to paycheck, week to week, month to month.
A universal basic income is the way to go.
A basic income that supports the bottom half of society with enough to pay for basic needs.
There is no doubt that many businesses that are booming during the pandemic will continue to thrive.
But we continue to look at issues like climate change or renewable energy or poverty and we don’t think of how everything fits together. And right now we’re lacking a map of how to go forward.
No matter how this all unfolds, the biggest thing that’s going to contribute to better futures is social nodes of communication and social capital.
WE CAN’T GO BACK JUST TO GO OUT AND HAVE AN ORGY OF CONSUMPTION AND BACK TO NORMAL WITHOUT LEARNING ANYTHING FROM THIS.
WE CAN’T ALLOW GOVERNMENTS TO BECOME AUTHORITARIAN. NOR ALLOW SOCIAL MEDIA NETWORKS TO REMAIN UNREGULATED.
It is already clear that in future we will look back on 2020 as a turning point, the beginning of a new era.



