Tags
Algorithms., Artificial Intelligence., Capitalism and Greed, Capitalism vs. the Climate., Climate change, CONSTITUTION FOR THE EARTH., Earth, Environment, Extinction, Globalization, Inequility, Technology, The Future of Mankind, United Nations, Visions of the future., World aid commission
(Twenty minutes read to change the world)
NOW IS THE TIME TO WRITE A CONSTITUTION FOR THE PLANET THAT WE ALL LIVE ON – THE EARTH.
We can observe our Planet from space, but many of us are still not able to see it as a unique and precious miracle of life.
Why a Constitution?
Because most of the declarations like the universal declaration of human rights or the US constitution do not, constitute viable instructions for change: they are rather moral discussion papers, containing much wishful thinking, or a list of flaws people are perceived to commit in their relation to Nature.
Because neither human beings nor culture is independent self-sufficient existences – they are dependent on the Earth.
Only the Earth can be thought of as a relatively independent existence within the Universe.
They depend on the health and prosperity of the biotic assembly that constitutes our Planet.
Because there will be no exit strategy without a healthy Earth.
The relationship between man and Earth up to now has been exploited for profit.
All noble sentiments and efforts to understand and resolve the current crisis while ignoring the splitting of the planet into two opposing systems – Culture and Nature – are doomed to failure.
The currently prevailing anthropocentric vision of the world is incorrect, not only in its details and in its specific arguments, but also in its deepest underlying principles – in short, in its entirety.
Culture is not a continuation of natural evolution by different means.
Culture is an artificial system opposing Nature.
If it were set as Nature is in biophilia, life-reverencing format, then Culture’s self-activity would grow in a desirable way.
Culture would respect Nature and both systems would co-operate at a new level.

Our world is not only surrounded by junk it is full of junk.
———————————————————————————————-
HERE: IS A DRAFT EARTH’S CONSTITUTION.
Feel free to add.
Article I
The Earth
- The Earth is the natural home to all of its interdependent live beings. It cannot belong to any biological species, not even to the human species. Humans, the founders of Culture, must not ravage the Earth to the detriment of themselves or of any other living beings.
- The Earth represents the highest value for both our species and for human Culture. It constitutes the oldest, broadest and most powerful creative activity, the unique planetary subjectivity. We have to defend its right to evolution, and its right to maintain a planet-wide balance between animate and inanimate systems.
- Our Culture must not expand further, neither at the expense of the natural diversity of the planet nor at the expense of human health.
- As a system superordinate both to humans and to their artificial Culture, the Earth is sovereign and our elected and controlled institutions must become its defenders and advocates.
- We commit ourselves to halting the decline, destruction, and pollution of Earth’s natural existence and, to that effect, also to advancing the recognition of a system of human responsibility, including effective and deterrent sanctions against those who fail to respect this Constitution.
Article II
Humans
- Human beings are not the immediate cause of the current environmental crisis. The root cause of the crisis is the systemic conflict between the artificial cultural orderliness and the natural orderliness of the Earth.
- Humanity is not responsible for the Earth. It is responsible for Culture, its product, which has divided the Earth into two mutually opposing systems: the Cultural and the Natural. It is the paramount task of law, politics, and science in the coming period of life-reverencing – biophilia – Culture to reconcile Culture with Nature.
- The human species subjectivity is restricted by the superior subjectivity of the Earth. All persons and government authorities are obliged to respect this wider subjectivity, protect the diversity and unity of the biosphere and sparingly use the inanimate products of the Earth.
- We hereby declare that the human species can only be biologically congruent with natural existence – not with artificial cultural existence. We acknowledge that anything that is good for the Earth is good for human beings as well.
- All legal systems must protect and enforce the natural orderliness of the Earth.
Article III
Culture
- Culture is an artificial system with its own internal, intrinsic information, and that is intellectual culture. A change in the orientation and contents of the intellectual culture, including values, knowledge, and precepts, is a prerequisite of the biophilia transformation of Culture.
- Culture, which is a human creation, is neither a continuation of the evolution of Nature nor a process in its improvement. It is an artificial and temporary construct, which is dependent on mass, energy, and information coming from Nature. It is a structure incongruent with the biological structure of human beings and it will cease to exist after the demise of humankind.
- The Culture system’s growth marginalizes and exterminates live systems and breaks up the natural structures of the Earth. Should the evolution of the Culture system’s continue, it must abandon the predatory orientation and adopt a position of a humble integration into the superior evolution of our planet.
- It has been political entities – States – that have made the ravaging of Nature possible, since these States have, directly or indirectly, supported the development of the predatory entrepreneurship and unrestricted extension of both materials- and energy-intensive consumer techniques. These States, therefore, bear the main responsibility for the current crisis of civilization.
- All States must be obliged to take steps towards a state of sustainable co-operation between Culture and the Earth. They are charged with the task of changing the predatory spiritual paradigm of Culture, starting the process of adopting biophile laws and spreading knowledge about the need for reconciliation between Culture and Nature.
Article 1V
Technology.
1. New innovations and uses of technology will be an active and integral part of the
international development story going forward. Developing a deeper understanding of how technology can impact development will better prepare everyone for the future, and help all of us drive it in new and positive directions.
2. The link between technology and governance is critical to consider in a better
understanding of how technology could be developed and deployed. The distinction between “developed” and “developing” nations should no longer apply.
3. Strong global cooperation on a range of issues drives technological
breakthroughs that combat disease, climate change, and energy shortages.
4. Governance, in turn, will play a major role in determining what technologies
are developed and who those technologies are intended, and able, to benefit.
5. Transparency allows states to glean insights from massive datasets to vastly improve the management and allocation of financial and environmental resources.
6. All technology must carry a world-recognized seal of safety verifying the authenticity of anything.
——————————————————————————————-
But no one was prepared for a world in which large-scale catastrophes would occur with such breathtaking frequency. Not surprisingly, the coronavirus pandemic has put enormous pressure on an already overstressed global economy.
Most nation-states could no longer afford their locked-in costs, let alone respond to increased citizen demands for more security, more healthcare coverage, more social programs and services, and more infrastructure repair.
So yes I can hear you saying this will never happen.
How would such a constitution be ratified, by who, at what cost, who will pay?
It can be ratified in the United Nations, passed at the next global climate summit, the cost of not doing so outweighs any alternative, and it can be paid for fairly by placing a world aid commission on all activities that are for-profit sake. ( see the previous post on world aid commission)
As you have seen, each of the scenarios, if it were to unfold, would call for different strategies and have different implications for how a range of organizations will work and relate to changes in technology. But no matter what the world might emerge, there are real choices to be made about what areas and goals to address and how to drive success toward particular objectives.
“Biodiversity is the totality of all inherited variation in the life forms of Earth, of which we are one species. We study and save it to our great benefit. We ignore and degrade it to our great peril.” Wilson, Edward O.
All comments and contributions welcome. All like clicks and abuse chucked in the bin.

The problem is that most people have no clear understanding of what civilization is or, perhaps as important, what it isn’t.
Wikipedia. According to this seemingly omniscient cyber-seer, civilization is defined most broadly as “any complex state-society characterized by a social hierarchy, symbolic communication forms (typically, writing systems), and a perceived separation from and domination over the natural environment”.
How many of us would fight for civilization if we thought that we were fighting for the increasing complexity of the state and its social hierarchy?
How many of the agrarians amongst us would fight for a civilization that defined itself as being separate from the natural environment and as seeking to dominate it?
How many of us would fight for incessant urbanization, centralization, and the passive domestication of ourselves alongside the domestication of other organisms?
How many of us had realized that being civilized was the willingness to make ourselves cattle in the service of increasingly complex social hierarchies?
How many of us thought that civilization was marked by the sort of “specialization of labour” that had reduced human work to that of a disposable cog in an increasingly large and complex mechanism?
How many of us guessed that civilization was defined by culturally ingrained progressivism and other supremacist ideologies?
How many of us perceived that taxation was civilized and that increasing taxation was therefore and presumably a mark of increasing civilization?
If this is civilization we would be justified in hoping that civilization would go to hell and that, indeed, we would be equally justified in believing that it was all too evidently going there.
However, it is still a helpful framework with which to view how humans come together and form a society.
All civilizations have certain characteristics. These include: (1) large population centres; (2) monumental architecture and unique art styles; (3) shared communication strategies; (4) systems for administering territories; (5) a complex division of labour; and (6) the division of people into social and economic classes.
Again according to Wikipedia, “civilization” is merely an ideological construct of the eighteenth century! It is not a reality in itself but an idea by which an irreligious and irrational “rationalism” can explain and explain away, to its own prejudiced satisfaction, the history of human culture.
This is how civilization is defined on the internet.
Is civilization worth defending?
Should we aim to conform to it so that we can be considered civilized?
Maggie Thatcher once said that there is no such thing as a society. How wrong she was
What is civilization? It is the conforming of the heart of humanity – equality for all.
Culture is everything about human society, i.e. it refers to the knowledge and features of a specific group of people living in a region.
Many forget that a culture is only as great as the rival cultures around it, and all history was written by the winners. So if we are to reinvent anything it won’t be civilisation, but the culture that makes us civilised that will have to change.
To do this we will have to ask what has been tried before and what the results were?
What resources are available, what new theories are there?
WE CAN’T CHANGE ANYTHING UNTILL EDUCATION/ HEALTH IS FREE FOR ALL.
WE CAN’T CHANGE ANYTHING TILL WE SHARE THE RICHES OF THE EARTH– FRESHWATER, FRESH AIR, GREEN ENERGY. ALL FOODS ARE NON-MODIFIED AND SOLD UNDER ITS NATURAL CONDITIONS.
WE CAN’T CHANGE ANYTHING UNLESS INEQUALITY DISAPPEARS. THE RICHEST 1% NOW OWN HALF OF THE WORLD’S WEALTH. THE GAP BETWEEN THE HAVES AND HAVE – NOT’S WHERE ONLY A FRACTION OF SOCIETY REAPS THE BENEFITS OF ECONOMIC GROWTH WILL HAVE TO BE TACKLED – THE BIFURCATED ECONOMY.
(Forty years of neoliberal policy means that wealthy individuals and large companies today have so much “surplus of capital” that they don’t know what to do with it. billions parkEed in tax havens.)
WE CAN’T CHANGE ANYTHING TILL RACISM AND RELIGIOUS BIGOTRY IS ABOLISHED
WE CAN’T CHANGE ANYTHING BY CREATING LOTTO MILLIONAIRES WHILE SLUMS EXIST.
WE CAN’T CHANGE ANYTHING WHILE THE ARMS INDUSTRY EXISTS.
WE CAN’T CHANGE ANYTHING WHILE SOVERGIN FUNDS EXIST.
WE CAN’T CHANGE ANYTHING WHILE PROFIT SEEKING ALGORITHMS EXIST.
WE CAN’T CHANGE ANYTHING TILL WE REALISE THAT EARTH COMES FIRST THEN ITS PEOPLE.
WE CAN’T CHANGE ANYTHING TILL WE ACT AS ONE.
WE CAN’T CHANGE ANYTHING TILL ALL WORLD DEBT IS WRITTEN OFF. TOTAL PUBLIC DEBT WILL BE IN THE TRILLIONS. WORLDWIDE, THE TOTAL MOUNTAIN OF DEBT HAS REACHED A RECORD AMOUNT OF 322% OF THE WORLD GDP.
WE CAN’T CHANGE ANYTHING TILL WE UNDERSTAND THAT ONE’S REACH MUST GO BEYOND ONE GRASP. THE CORONAVIRUS IS THE PERFECT TIME TO LAUNCH A NEW GREEN DEAL THAT IS AMBITIOUS ENOUGHT TO SAVE THE PLANET. NEVER MIND WORLD CONFERENCES TALKING ABOUT IT DO IT. THINK BIG. ACT NOW. TOGETHER.
WE CAN’T CHANGE ANYTHING UNTILL WE DO AWAY WITH DIVIDENDS AND REPLACE THEM WITH A BASIC LIVING INCOME.
WE CAN’T CHANGE ANYTHING UNLESS WE REFORM THE UNITED NATIONS REMOVE THE VETO AND TURN IT FROM A BEGGING SHOP TO A FULLY FUNDED ORGANISATION WITH A PERTUPITUAL INCOME FROM A 0.05% WORLD AID FUND. ( See previous posts.)
WE CAN’T CHANGE ANYTHING UNLESS WE CURBE CONSUMERISM AND MOVE TO SUSTAINABILITY. WE’VE CONSUMED BEYOND OUR MEANS FOR A GENERATION AND NOW THE BILL IS COMING DUE SUDDENLY.
WE CAN’T CHANGE ANYTHING WITH GDP AS OUR CULTURAL GOAL.
WE CAN’T CHANGE ANYTHING WHILE WE TOLERATE ZOMBIE BANKS. NO FEWER THAN 147 INDIVIDUAL NATIONAL BANKS CRISES ACCURED BETWEEN 1970 AND 2011 ACCORDING TO THE IMF. IT’S TIME TO PUT THE BANKING SYSTEM IN GOVERNMENT HANDS AND TO DISMANTLE CASION CAPITALISM.
My point is the pandemic and its aftermath will be super-consequential for how we live the rest of our lives. There will be implications across the board; for business, government, culture, sports and the arts, as well as behaviour.
It’s not too soon to think about that.
Smartphones have given us an always-on connection to the world’s information but history develops our researching skills and our understanding of human behaviour.
What we’ve done in the last generation is we’ve replaced normal human interactions and social capital with technology and money.
And we’ve done that with a deleterious impact on our health and our happiness because technology and money hijack our brains in a stronger way than slow, kind of boring conversations do and yet that’s our heritage.
Our culture is systems blind.
Monetary stability, public safety and all manner of civilised goals have grown too complicated and big. The idea of the trickle-down effect of the free capitalist market is no longer true it continually funnels things towards the top. It doesn’t speak to the bottom half of society now.
They say that the best things in life are free, that adage is only true if basic needs are covered. A lot of people are living paycheck to paycheck, week to week, month to month.
A universal basic income is the way to go.
A basic income that supports the bottom half of society with enough to pay for basic needs.
There is no doubt that many businesses that are booming during the pandemic will continue to thrive.
But we continue to look at issues like climate change or renewable energy or poverty and we don’t think of how everything fits together. And right now we’re lacking a map of how to go forward.
No matter how this all unfolds, the biggest thing that’s going to contribute to better futures is social nodes of communication and social capital.
WE CAN’T GO BACK JUST TO GO OUT AND HAVE AN ORGY OF CONSUMPTION AND BACK TO NORMAL WITHOUT LEARNING ANYTHING FROM THIS.
WE CAN’T ALLOW GOVERNMENTS TO BECOME AUTHORITARIAN. NOR ALLOW SOCIAL MEDIA NETWORKS TO REMAIN UNREGULATED.
It is already clear that in future we will look back on 2020 as a turning point, the beginning of a new era.
