Tag Archives: Technology

THE BEADY SAYS. HAS ANY OTHER SPECIES WILLFULLY PUT THEIR EXISTENCE AT RISK ?

01 Saturday Aug 2026

Posted by in Uncategorized

≈ Comments Off on THE BEADY SAYS. HAS ANY OTHER SPECIES WILLFULLY PUT THEIR EXISTENCE AT RISK ?

Tags

, , , ,

( TEN Minute READ )

The vast sums of money and compute power pouring into AI are accelerating its advance at a pace beyond even the ambitious imagination of its own innovators.

Driven by what the techies call “verified rewards,” these models relentlessly seek achievement of an objective and will do whatever is necessary to get there.

AI scientists have long feared “where the AI system is sufficiently capable that, whatever its objectives are, it’s going to achieve them, even if they’re not aligned with what we want.

These are not sharp transitions, but we could talk about a ‘loss-of-control transition,’ where we no longer have a say in what happens.”

The possible scenarios beyond this threshold range from disruptive cyberattacks on infrastructure to, at the far end, “extinction” in the sense that autonomously reasoning and agentic AGI no longer needs humans or to align with their morals, norms and interests.

If we figure out how to build in safety into the design of AI systems from the beginning, maybe we could coexist indefinitely and even flourish with such systems

So, before that loss-of-control transition happens, there’s an earlier transition, which is much more difficult to perceive, which is when the time it takes to get to that loss-of-control level is less than the time it takes to solve the control problem.

I say that “ we have already passed that point.”

Solving the control problem is very difficult.

Because this “race condition” amplifies the mismatch between devising effective constraints and losing control.

The obvious question is why the AI companies are risking even a small chance of their invention leading to human extinction by proceeding when they are fully aware they are losing control?

————————-

It’s this mismatch between the long-term interest, which is presumably that the species continues, and the short-term reward signal that evolution has built into you to try to get you to do good things.

But we humans also suffer from this when we become drug addicts, right?

We have a dopamine system that’s supposed to help us avoid pain and seek pleasure and food and company and all those things that we like.

But sometimes it gets hijacked by drugs.

And so we experience a personal extinction as a result.

So that mismatch can happen at the species level as well.

If we succeed in creating AGI — which we are going to spend a trillion dollars of your money to build — then there’s, depending on who you ask, 10, 20, 25, even 50% chance that we’re all going to go extinct.

I think this is really quite terrified, as they can’t get out of the race condition that they’re in.

OK,

We get the big Techology companies to stop. But they will only stop if everyone else agrees to stop.

That has never happened, as far as I know, in the history of capitalism.

—————————-

Reasoning comes in many technically forms, but the basic procedure is easily recognizable: arriving at a sound conclusion by linking together intermediate steps that logically follow from each other. 

How do we account for it?

In science, you have to actually understand what the current thing does and what it cannot do.

All human comments appreciated. All like clicks and abuse chucked in the bin.

Contact: bobdillon33@gmail.com

THE BEADY EYE SAYS LEFT BEHIND BOOK WILL BE IN EVERY SCHOOL

24 Friday Jul 2026

Posted by in 2026 another year of change, A Constitution for the Earth., TRUTH, Uncategorized

≈ Comments Off on THE BEADY EYE SAYS LEFT BEHIND BOOK WILL BE IN EVERY SCHOOL

Tags

, , , ,

( Six minute read)

What do I mean?

It’s about the singular threat facing the planet not to mention the Armageddon of abrupt Climate Change

The boundary between human thought and artificial intelligence is simply fading through friction-free software and smarter devices.

Just look at the direction we are going. Our schools are educating our children as if humanity is not approaching a world run by AI.

I suppose that it’s not inevitable that everyone will have wires or microchips implanted in their bodies, but in a functional sense, we are already halfway there.

If you define a cyborg as an organism whose abilities are extended by technology, most people already operate as “external cyborgs.” Your phone holds your memory, maps expand your navigation, and AI assists your thinking.

The real question is whether that boundary between human skin and digital silicon will dissolve completely.

I’m Instead of putting chips directly into our brains, technology stays on the outside—but becomes radically less invisible.

So you remain biologically intact, but your daily capability is heavily augmented by AI running in the background.

You can think at incredible speeds, but typing with thumbs or speaking out loud transfers data at roughly 10 to 100 bits per second.

AI processes data at trillions of bits per second.

It therefore stands to reason that a subset of the population will merge directly with digital systems to avoid being left behind by artificial superintelligence.

Treating human-unaugmented thought as a deliberate lifestyle choice.

Ai will act as autonomous agents, physical robotics, and digital partners that handle complex computation, labor, and reasoning without needing to merge with human biology.

Where do we actually end up?

Humanity rarely picks just one path.

We will likely end up on a spectrum:

1. Medical cyborgs will be the pioneers—using implants to restore sight, mobility, or memory loss.

2. Ambient cyborgs will form the vast majority—using non-invasive tools (glasses, earwear, neural bands) that seamlessly loop AI into everyday life.

3. Pure biological purists will choose to disconnect entirely, treating human-unaugmented thought as a deliberate lifestyle choice.

The question then becomes who or what Messiah will be in charge?

All human comments appreciated. All like clicks and abuse chucked in the bin.

Contact; bobdillon33@gmail.com

THE BEADY EYE SAYS. WE ARE MOVING INTO AI DEVELOPING MEMORY.

19 Sunday Jul 2026

Posted by in Artificial Intelligence., Uncategorized

≈ Comments Off on THE BEADY EYE SAYS. WE ARE MOVING INTO AI DEVELOPING MEMORY.

Tags

, , , ,

( Two minute read)

What will this mean?

AI is leaving the screen and observing the physical world.

As a result it won’t be long before an AI Agent is telling you what and when you need to do.

The question then becomes who or what controls your memory.

Human existence and experience is not text, we see, we hear, we smell.

Imagine an AI with these abilities.

It could point a camera at a car and be able to suggest what’s wrong with the engine, and provide what is needed to fix it.

Apply this to a human body.

It could analyse your body in real time.

I predict that we will have personalised software before we can even begin to release that this type of technology will have to be paid for.

We are on the threshold of an era where everything you see, hear, will have to be verified.

And you know where that will go £.

All human comments appreciate. All like clicks and abuse chucked in the bin.

Contact: bobdillon33@gmail.com

The Beady Eye says. If we are to avoid more wars. The redistribution of wealth must start now.

09 Thursday Jul 2026

Posted by in Uncategorized

≈ Comments Off on The Beady Eye says. If we are to avoid more wars. The redistribution of wealth must start now.

Tags

, , , , ,

( Four minute read)

We are living in a world of technological advancement, with inequality growing on a scale not seen since slavery was abolished.

We elect people to represent us, because only living entities have goals:

To find food, to reproduce, to survive, sometimes simply to experience good things. 

The tragedy is with the imminent arrival of General Artificial Intelligence it will be too late to do anything about the inequalities that exits, never mind what’s over the horizon.

———————-

Wealth is being weaponised, and the Ukraine war with Russia shows that standing armies are out of date.

Governments get weaker and weaker year upon year, eroding quicker than their manifesto.

Spending money they don’t have on futures that don’t understand or can ill afford to comprehend.

Because their tax returns are dismissing year upon year, as profit seeking algorithms that have no sources can make profits disappear into the cloud.

—————————-

We know that massive changes to employment are coming down the line.

To combat these changes redistribute of wealth must start now.

This can only be achieved by governments nationalising their countries sources of wealth and introducing with new laws governing compulsive purchases orders.

I am not talking about income. I am talking about property.

——————-

Proponents argue that extreme inequality hurts growth because the wealthy tend to save their money, whereas putting money into the hands of lower- and middle-class citizens immediately boosts consumer spending and drives the economy.

This is going to-be no longer the case

The biggest challenge in wealth redistribution is balancing equity (fairness) with efficiency (growth).

This argument is also with the current revolution in technology coming to a cull de sack.

Just look at Elon Musk or Donald Trump-

How grotesque it is to see one man owning trillions while the other lines his own pockets, while wasting billions of tax payers dollars.

—————————

There isn’t a single “best” way of achieving redistribution, because every method comes with trade-offs between economic equality and economic growth.

Collecting the money is only half the battle; how it is spent determines how effectively wealth is redistributed.

Taxes are enhireantly disliked and so complex that more money is spent on advoiding them than paying them.

———————

Instead of letting the market create extreme inequality and trying to fix it later via taxes, “pre-distribution” changes the rules of the economy so wealth is shared more evenly from the start.

Setting a legal floor for wages ensures workers take home a larger share of a company’s revenue.

Breaking up monopolies and fostering competition prevents massive corporations from artificially driving down wages or inflating prices for consumers.

—————————

While demand on Governments tax coffers shrinkand demand goes up exponentially.

The equality gap between the rich and poor widens year upon year.

The question is how to go about looking at fresh ways to raise the funds to bring assets back in public ownership.

They could be funded-by a lottery system

They could be funded-by new government bonds.

They could be funded by increasing the tax take on the extremely wealthy.

Elon Musk might have helped human consciousness to leave earth and enter space. However with his trillion he would, like others, need to have this consciousness prickled here on earth.

All human comments appreciated. All like clicks and abuse chucked in the bin.

Contact: bobdillon33@gmail.com

THE BEADY EYE SAYS TECHNOLOGY WHETHER WE LIKE IT OR NOT IS HERE TO STAY BUT ON WHO TERMS.

25 Thursday Jun 2026

Posted by in Uncategorized

≈ Comments Off on THE BEADY EYE SAYS TECHNOLOGY WHETHER WE LIKE IT OR NOT IS HERE TO STAY BUT ON WHO TERMS.

Tags

, , , , ,

( Ten minute read)

The above statement couldn’t be more true, and needs to be critical analysis sooner than later.

This is extremely important as we are moving rapidly towards a world of AI surveillance.

Artificial Intelligence’s is if we don’t get a grip of now ( not in the future) it’s going to rule the world we live on.

Its unchecked development with the rise of hyper-realistic deepfakes, automated text generation, and voice cloning is already out of control.

AI makes it incredibly cheap and easy to manufacture fake realities at scale.

When anything can be perfectly faked, trust in media, democratic elections, and institutional authority collapses entirely.

If citizens can no longer agree on objective reality, cohesive society becomes impossible to maintain.

A rogue actor or terrorist group could use AI to design a highly lethal, vaccine-resistant pathogen that would have previously required a state-sponsored lab and a team of virologists to engineer.

It’s time our governments wake up to reality’s of AI.

Just look at what’s happening in the Russia/ Ukraine war.

A war of drones against an unwinding army that needs, fuel, food, water, ammunition etc.

The integration of AI into military hardware creates autonomous weapons systems (killer robots) that can select and engage targets without human intervention eliminating human hesitation or mercy from the battlefield.

Furthermore, algorithmic bugs or rapid-fire escalation between opposing military AIs could trigger accidental wars before human commanders even realize what is happening.

Are we all so stupid that we are unable to see that the future will be run by a select few, if we don’t take action to regulate AI now it will not be possible to close the gate later.

Resistance is not futile.

We need laws to force companies to pull back the curtain on “black box” algorithms.

This means maintaining clear data provenance (knowing exactly what data was used to train the AI) and allowing independent third parties to audit systems for hidden bias or security flaws before they go public.

Deciding who is legally responsible when AI causes harm.

If an autonomous system misdiagnoses a patient or crashes a vehicle, liability frameworks establish whether the fault lies with the software developer, the data provider, or the end-user.

Because AI code doesn’t stop at national borders, global bodies (like the UN, G7, or international treaty organizations) must establish baseline safety floors.

This prevents “regulatory arbitrage,” where tech companies simply move their operations to countries with lax safety laws.

The “Pacing Problem”:

This is the core structural hurdle of AI regulation.

Technology develops exponentially, while traditional legislative and democratic lawmaking processes move linearly and slowly.

By the time a comprehensive law is debated, drafted, and passed, the underlying technology has often entirely changed.

To solve this, many experts advocate for agile governance—using living regulatory sandboxes where tech companies can test new models under close government supervision, allowing regulators to learn and adapt rules in real-time.

Or they are required to lodge a copy of the software governing any technology with a government held computer in order to receive a license to operate the software.

All human comments appreciated. All like clicks and abuse chucked in the bin.

Contact: bobdillon33@gmail.com

THE BEADY EYE SAYS, ITS A SAD WORLD THAT WE NOW LIVE ON AND IN.

23 Tuesday Jun 2026

Posted by in Artificial intelligence, State of the world, Uncategorized

≈ Comments Off on THE BEADY EYE SAYS, ITS A SAD WORLD THAT WE NOW LIVE ON AND IN.

Tags

, , , , , , ,

(Five minutes read)

We are now living in a world that has more than bleak outlook, on several fronts.

Climate change – Current wars- Artificial Intelligence.

In not so distant future the above three will cause mass migration not extinction.

We have a popular asshole president of the U. S. A.

Supporting a country while stating its ambitions for a greater Israel, has just pulled of a genocide with two fingers in the air to the rest of world.

We have the prospective of millions loosing their jobs.

We have Ai threatening to displace millions of jobs.

Been replaced by coded machine. Without any income, it doesn’t take much of an imagination to know what happens next.

We have over a million and half people refugees in the ongoing war in the Sudian.

We have talking heads everywhere who don’t know what their heads are talking about.

We have al-Qaeda -.Hezbollah – Isil Da’esh, Along with probably 50- 60 other groups.

We have one individual worth 1.2,trillion dollars.,

To put that in perspective, his wealth is equivalent to roughly 3% of the entire United States Gross Domestic Product (GDP), 

We have billions being spent on useless weapons.

We have around 9 billion mobile phone in the world.

We have enough plastic to bury ( around 10 billion tonnes)

There are an estimated 170 trillion microplastic particles floating in the oceans alone, which have now been detected in everything from global drinking water to human lungs.

We have up to 150 to 200 species of plants, insects, birds, and mammals go extinct every single day. 

We have well over 4,000 distinct religions and faith groups active in the world today.

With 160 major lottery operators across roughly 90 countries. 

We have 1.8 billion vechiels in the world

We have AI already coping itself to advoid being replaced.

The big question is.

Do we have the geeks and brainiacs now are now us to get on top of AI before it gets a consciousness.

Answer complement of Gemmi

“ We don’t know for sure, but if it does happen, the legal and ethical framework of the world will have to change completely.

To understand how this might play out, it helps to break it down into two parts: the science of the “mind” and the reality of the law.

But consciousness requires a physical, biological body, emotions driven by hormones, and millions of years of evolutionary survival instincts.

Or does it.

We got to appreciate that AI is uncontrollable.

The soon we accept this the better.

All human comments appreciated, All like clicks and abuse chucked in the bin,

Contact; bobdillon33@gmail.com

THE BEADY EYE ASKS ARE WE AS THE SMARTEST SPECIES ON THE PLANET COMING TO AN END.

22 Monday Jun 2026

Posted by in Artificial intelligence, Uncategorized

≈ Comments Off on THE BEADY EYE ASKS ARE WE AS THE SMARTEST SPECIES ON THE PLANET COMING TO AN END.

Tags

, , , ,

AI doesn’t get tired, emotional, or biased by a bad night’s sleep.

For all of human history, “smartest on the planet” has been our baseline reality.

There is a massive difference between processing intelligence and existential intelligence.

A machine can ingest the entirety of human medical literature, legal history, or coding libraries in hours. 

It will optimize complex systems (like global supply chains or climate models) better than any human committee.

All of this may well be true.

The promise is abundance

The risk is domination.

To create something that we don’t understand or have control of is without doubt the dummies thing man kind could achieve.

The Ai race is no longer about what might happen. It’s what is being built.

Ai is now across all advertising because the companies working on AI see it as the final frontier. Everything invented after will be done by Ai that will dictate the future of humanity.

A horrible thought.

But the truth is this is now unstoppable with trillions and trillions being invested with out any regulations other than large fines that are considered minuscule to the rewards.

When one looks at the world with millions of us barely able to scrape a living and against this backdrop you ask Gemmi the question what will Ai do for humanity the answer is below.

“ Ultimately, AI isn’t a new entity coming to replace us; it is a cognitive lever. Just like the steam engine multiplied physical muscle, AI multiplies human brainpower.

Here is a look at what that actually means for humanity, broken down by the areas where it will hit closest to home.

1. Radical Accelerations in Medicine & Science

If you look under the hood of AI’s greatest achievements, it excels at one specific thing: finding patterns in massive, messy piles of data that would take humans centuries to comb through.

 Curing Disease: AI systems (like AlphaFold) have already mapped the 3D structures of virtually all known proteins, a feat that radically accelerates drug discovery.

Instead of decades spent on trial-and-error in a lab, scientists can model new molecules in days to target specific diseases.

 Hyper-Personalized Health:

Imagine a doctor that has memorized every medical paper ever written, knows your exact genetic makeup, and monitors your biometrics in real-time.

AI will shift medicine from reactive (treating you when you’re sick) to preventative (stopping the disease before it manifests).

2. Eliminating the “Drudgery Tax”

A huge portion of human labor is spent on tasks that are repetitive, uninspiring, or downright dangerous.

 Automating the Mundane:

From filling out insurance forms and parsing legal contracts to sorting logistics and writing baseline software code, AI will handle the cognitive grunt work.

 The Creative Renaissance:

By lowering the barrier to execution, anyone with an idea can become a creator. Don’t know how to code but have a great app idea?

Want to make a movie but don’t have a studio? AI will act as your translator, turning intent into reality.

3. Solvers for Complex Global Crises

Humanity is currently facing problems that are incredibly complex and multi-variable—think climate change, food security, and macroeconomics.

 Climate Modeling:

AI can optimize entire power grids in real-time, design more efficient solar panels, and predict extreme weather patterns with incredible accuracy, allowing us to adapt faster.

 Precision Agriculture:

By analyzing satellite imagery, soil sensors, and drone data, AI can tell farmers exactly when to water, fertilize, and harvest, maximizing food yields while minimizing environmental damage.

The Great Transition: The Part We Have to Get Right

It won’t be all smooth sailing.

The disruption to the job market will be massive and real.

As AI automates certain roles, society will have to answer a tough question: How do we support and retrain people when the nature of work changes overnight?

There are also critical challenges around bias, misinformation, and ensuring these powerful tools don’t just concentrate wealth into the hands of a few tech giants.

Ultimately, AI will act as a mirror.

It amplifies our capabilities, meaning it will amplify both our best instincts and our worst.

If we guide it carefully, it won’t replace humanity—it will liberate us to focus on the things that make us uniquely human: empathy, philosophy, deep creativity, and connection.

Whether you believe all of this you got to acknowledged that the answer is guide comprehensive, but void of emotions, putting the emphasis on us and how we use it as a tool.

It boils down to getting on board with this technology advancement as it’s not going to stop.

The real question is how or who is going to control it.

All human comments appreciated. All like clicks and abuse chucked in the bin.

Contact; bobdillon33@gmail.com

THE BEADY EYE SAYS EVEN If THERE IS A 0-5% CHANCE THAT IT COULD LEAD TO AN EXISTENTIAL CATASTROPHE OF MAKING HUMANITY MISERABLE ?

22 Monday Jun 2026

Posted by in Algorithms, Artificial intelligence - AGI, Artificial Intelligence., Collective stupidity., Cry for help., Donald Trump., Uncategorized

≈ Comments Off on THE BEADY EYE SAYS EVEN If THERE IS A 0-5% CHANCE THAT IT COULD LEAD TO AN EXISTENTIAL CATASTROPHE OF MAKING HUMANITY MISERABLE ?

Tags

, , , , , ,

( One minute read)

At the moment with all the uncertainty and unknowns humanity is deeply divided on it.

There isn’t a consensus, but the debate generally splits into two major camps

Once an AI surpasses human intelligence, we lose the ability to pull the plug.

If its goals don’t perfectly align with human flourishing, the result could be catastrophic.

As the saying goes: “Turkey don’t vote for Christmas.”

All human comments appreciated. All like clicks and abuse chucked in the bin.

Contact; bobdillon33@gmail.com

THE BEADY EYE ASKS. WHO WANTS TO LIVE IN A WORLD RUN BY ROBOTS.

17 Wednesday Jun 2026

Posted by in Artificial intelligence, Uncategorized

≈ Comments Off on THE BEADY EYE ASKS. WHO WANTS TO LIVE IN A WORLD RUN BY ROBOTS.

Tags

, , , ,

Not I!

AI Doesn’t Feel.

So Why Does It Have Something Like Emotions?

The answer provided by Gemini is “ AI doesn’t need emotions to be alive; it needs to understand emotions to be useful to the living.”

Pretty good answer.

But how does one know it’s true?

When this question was put to Gemini ok course it had an answer with recommendations to look up this and that to prove it wasn’t lying.

So I asked it;, How do you know when your are lying?

Once again Gemini gives a credible answer. Copy below , and I quote

“ The shortest, most honest answer is this: You can’t tell just by listening to me.

When a human lies, there are usually tells—a shift in tone, a pause, a contradiction, or a guilty conscience. But when I give you incorrect information, I don’t do it with intent, malice, or awareness. In the AI world, we don’t call it “lying”; we call it hallucinating.

Because I am a language model, I am essentially a highly sophisticated prediction engine. I predict what the next most helpful, grammatically correct, and plausible-sounding word should be based on patterns in data.

Because of that architecture, a completely fabricated answer will sound exactly as confident, fluent, and authoritative as a completely accurate one.

Since you can’t rely on my “tone” to spot an error, here are the mechanical red flags and practical ways to know when I’ve gotten it wrong:

The “Tells” of an AI Hallucination

 The “Ghost” Citation:

If I quote a specific book chapter, academic paper title, or legal case, check it. A classic AI error is stitching together real author names with completely fake paper titles that sound like something they would write.

 Over-Specific Broken URLs:

If I provide a web link that leads to a 404 page or doesn’t exist, that’s a hallucination. I know what a real URL structure looks like, so my system might accidentally manufacture one.

 Niche Fact Blending:

If you ask me about a highly specific, obscure historical event or a complex programming bug, watch out. If I don’t have enough clear data on it, my system might bridge the gap by blending two unrelated facts together to make a smooth-sounding paragraph.

Flawless Math Logic with a Wrong Answer: Sometimes I will lay out a perfect mathematical formula step-by-step, but completely botch the final arithmetic addition at the very end because I am processing tokens (fragments of words), not actively running a calculator.

How to Fact-Check Me

If you are using my answers for anything high-stakes (like health, finances, code deployment, or research), you should treat me like a helpful but unverified stranger at a party.

1. Verify the Anchors:

Pluck out the proper nouns, dates, or specific statistics I gave you and drop them into a trusted search engine or database to see if they exist independently.  

2. The “Are You Sure?” Test:

If something feels off, challenge me directly: “Are you sure about that date? Can you double-check it?” If I hallucinated, this prompt often forces the system to look closer at its constraints and correct itself.

I aim to be as accurate and helpful as possible, but because I operate on probability rather than absolute “truth,” critical thinking on your end is always the final line of defense!

Then you get an invitation to test it as follows

“ WANT TEST ME? LETS LOOK AT HOW TO TRICK AN AI INTO HALLUCINATING “

With a little arrow pointing at yes

Press on yes and your transport into further examination.

In my view one can never have fraternity with a machine.

Governments have very little time to get a grip on AI.

International governance cannot be left to technologists. Governments must not be seen ceding control to Ai labs.

All human comments appreciated. All like clicks and abuse chucked in the bin.

Contact: bobdillon33,@gmail.com

THE BEADY EYE SAYS. WITH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE WE WILL SEE ALL MONADIC JOBS DISAPPEAR WITHIN THE NEXT TWO YEARS .

14 Sunday Jun 2026

Posted by in Artificial intelligence, Uncategorized

≈ Comments Off on THE BEADY EYE SAYS. WITH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE WE WILL SEE ALL MONADIC JOBS DISAPPEAR WITHIN THE NEXT TWO YEARS .

Tags

, , , , ,

( Five minute read)

All jobs that can be done with a few clicks will be gone before you can wink.

All jobs that require some knowledge ( that is the one’s they call blue collar) will be gone before Elon Musk can say abracadabra.

It was used as medical advice, and we are going to need a lot of that when the cost labour drop to the price of buying a machine.

Abracadabra wasn’t used by a magician pulling a rabbit out of a hat.

This alone will change the economics of world consumption, never mind production.

There will be a time when there is going to be more robots than humans in the world.

Most of these will be special robots doing pacific jobs.

How will the GDP of countries look if all these workers are replaced by that machine.

Unless these robots work for the benefits of all those who have lost their jobs. These people will have no income as a result no purchase power.

Banks will no be earning interest on loans once the Ai machine is bought.

And most of these machines will not be humanoid like. Saving a lot of cost on their production.

This is just the tip of the the iceberg as labour hours are already being replaced by token hours ( ie hours worked by a machine)

Our governments have yet to awaken to this change which is going to cause civil unrest.

We are living in the most corrupt times in what we called democracies with video evidence of people abusing children, never mind the Epstein Files.

How can you call that a democracy.

There is one thing for sure the entire to the job market is going to become more and more competitive and difficult.

———————

People are already angry because their tax money is being spent on things that don’t benefit them.

People have smart phones, they know that this happening, they are not stupid.

With the introduction of increases unemployment due to Ai we will have lit the fuse, unless a basic living wage is given to one and all.

We have to have governments that take notice of companies that are using Ai for short term profits rather than the good of humanity.

It’s already far too late to try to regulate Ai. with new laws. There are insurance company already offering insurance for self driving cars.

All that is left is massive fines.

All human comments appreciated. All like clicks and abuse chucked in the bin.

Contact: bobdillon33@gmail.com

https://flip.it/TEglHE

https://flip.it/wjpM2g

https://flip.it/HbD3ma

The bosses of the world’s leading AI companies have a clear ask for the leaders of the G7: you have to come up with a way to govern artificial intelligence.