Tag Archives: Capitalism and Greed

THE BEADY SAYS. HAS ANY OTHER SPECIES WILLFULLY PUT THEIR EXISTENCE AT RISK ?

01 Saturday Aug 2026

Posted by in Uncategorized

≈ Comments Off on THE BEADY SAYS. HAS ANY OTHER SPECIES WILLFULLY PUT THEIR EXISTENCE AT RISK ?

Tags

, , , ,

( TEN Minute READ )

The vast sums of money and compute power pouring into AI are accelerating its advance at a pace beyond even the ambitious imagination of its own innovators.

Driven by what the techies call “verified rewards,” these models relentlessly seek achievement of an objective and will do whatever is necessary to get there.

AI scientists have long feared “where the AI system is sufficiently capable that, whatever its objectives are, it’s going to achieve them, even if they’re not aligned with what we want.

These are not sharp transitions, but we could talk about a ‘loss-of-control transition,’ where we no longer have a say in what happens.”

The possible scenarios beyond this threshold range from disruptive cyberattacks on infrastructure to, at the far end, “extinction” in the sense that autonomously reasoning and agentic AGI no longer needs humans or to align with their morals, norms and interests.

If we figure out how to build in safety into the design of AI systems from the beginning, maybe we could coexist indefinitely and even flourish with such systems

So, before that loss-of-control transition happens, there’s an earlier transition, which is much more difficult to perceive, which is when the time it takes to get to that loss-of-control level is less than the time it takes to solve the control problem.

I say that “ we have already passed that point.”

Solving the control problem is very difficult.

Because this “race condition” amplifies the mismatch between devising effective constraints and losing control.

The obvious question is why the AI companies are risking even a small chance of their invention leading to human extinction by proceeding when they are fully aware they are losing control?

————————-

It’s this mismatch between the long-term interest, which is presumably that the species continues, and the short-term reward signal that evolution has built into you to try to get you to do good things.

But we humans also suffer from this when we become drug addicts, right?

We have a dopamine system that’s supposed to help us avoid pain and seek pleasure and food and company and all those things that we like.

But sometimes it gets hijacked by drugs.

And so we experience a personal extinction as a result.

So that mismatch can happen at the species level as well.

If we succeed in creating AGI — which we are going to spend a trillion dollars of your money to build — then there’s, depending on who you ask, 10, 20, 25, even 50% chance that we’re all going to go extinct.

I think this is really quite terrified, as they can’t get out of the race condition that they’re in.

OK,

We get the big Techology companies to stop. But they will only stop if everyone else agrees to stop.

That has never happened, as far as I know, in the history of capitalism.

—————————-

Reasoning comes in many technically forms, but the basic procedure is easily recognizable: arriving at a sound conclusion by linking together intermediate steps that logically follow from each other. 

How do we account for it?

In science, you have to actually understand what the current thing does and what it cannot do.

All human comments appreciated. All like clicks and abuse chucked in the bin.

Contact: bobdillon33@gmail.com

THE BEADY EYE SAYS LEFT BEHIND BOOK WILL BE IN EVERY SCHOOL

24 Friday Jul 2026

Posted by in 2026 another year of change, A Constitution for the Earth., TRUTH, Uncategorized

≈ Comments Off on THE BEADY EYE SAYS LEFT BEHIND BOOK WILL BE IN EVERY SCHOOL

Tags

, , , ,

( Six minute read)

What do I mean?

It’s about the singular threat facing the planet not to mention the Armageddon of abrupt Climate Change

The boundary between human thought and artificial intelligence is simply fading through friction-free software and smarter devices.

Just look at the direction we are going. Our schools are educating our children as if humanity is not approaching a world run by AI.

I suppose that it’s not inevitable that everyone will have wires or microchips implanted in their bodies, but in a functional sense, we are already halfway there.

If you define a cyborg as an organism whose abilities are extended by technology, most people already operate as “external cyborgs.” Your phone holds your memory, maps expand your navigation, and AI assists your thinking.

The real question is whether that boundary between human skin and digital silicon will dissolve completely.

I’m Instead of putting chips directly into our brains, technology stays on the outside—but becomes radically less invisible.

So you remain biologically intact, but your daily capability is heavily augmented by AI running in the background.

You can think at incredible speeds, but typing with thumbs or speaking out loud transfers data at roughly 10 to 100 bits per second.

AI processes data at trillions of bits per second.

It therefore stands to reason that a subset of the population will merge directly with digital systems to avoid being left behind by artificial superintelligence.

Treating human-unaugmented thought as a deliberate lifestyle choice.

Ai will act as autonomous agents, physical robotics, and digital partners that handle complex computation, labor, and reasoning without needing to merge with human biology.

Where do we actually end up?

Humanity rarely picks just one path.

We will likely end up on a spectrum:

1. Medical cyborgs will be the pioneers—using implants to restore sight, mobility, or memory loss.

2. Ambient cyborgs will form the vast majority—using non-invasive tools (glasses, earwear, neural bands) that seamlessly loop AI into everyday life.

3. Pure biological purists will choose to disconnect entirely, treating human-unaugmented thought as a deliberate lifestyle choice.

The question then becomes who or what Messiah will be in charge?

All human comments appreciated. All like clicks and abuse chucked in the bin.

Contact; bobdillon33@gmail.com

THE BEADY EYE SAYS. WE ARE MOVING INTO AI DEVELOPING MEMORY.

19 Sunday Jul 2026

Posted by in Artificial Intelligence., Uncategorized

≈ Comments Off on THE BEADY EYE SAYS. WE ARE MOVING INTO AI DEVELOPING MEMORY.

Tags

, , , ,

( Two minute read)

What will this mean?

AI is leaving the screen and observing the physical world.

As a result it won’t be long before an AI Agent is telling you what and when you need to do.

The question then becomes who or what controls your memory.

Human existence and experience is not text, we see, we hear, we smell.

Imagine an AI with these abilities.

It could point a camera at a car and be able to suggest what’s wrong with the engine, and provide what is needed to fix it.

Apply this to a human body.

It could analyse your body in real time.

I predict that we will have personalised software before we can even begin to release that this type of technology will have to be paid for.

We are on the threshold of an era where everything you see, hear, will have to be verified.

And you know where that will go £.

All human comments appreciate. All like clicks and abuse chucked in the bin.

Contact: bobdillon33@gmail.com

THE BEADY EYE ASKS WHY IS IT SO DIFFICULT TO GET HUMANS TO BELIEVE IN ANYTHING?

12 Sunday Jul 2026

Posted by in Truth, Uncategorized

≈ Comments Off on THE BEADY EYE ASKS WHY IS IT SO DIFFICULT TO GET HUMANS TO BELIEVE IN ANYTHING?

Tags

, , , ,

( Five minute read)

Truth is truth, regardless of belief.

It can feel incredibly frustrating when you present clear facts, solid data, or even personal experiences, only to watch someone completely brush them off.

It makes you wonder: Are we just hardwired to be stubborn?

That people don’t believe a fact doesn’t make it untrue, nor does an idea being believed by millions or even billions of people make it true.

The main reason why it is so difficult is that human brains evolved to protect our survival and our social status, not to act as objective, flawless calculators of truth.

Because truth is truth while belief exists only in the absence of knowledge of what the truth is.

We don’t judge information based purely on whether it’s true; we judge it based on what accepting it will do to our social standing.

 If a new truth threatens a person’s political alignment, religious community, or family ties, their brain registers that truth as a threat.

They will reject the fact to protect the relationship.

When people are presented with facts that contradict their core beliefs, it doesn’t just fail to convince them—it often makes them double down on their original stance.

We actively hunt for tiny scraps of information that prove us right, while completely ignoring mountains of evidence that prove us wrong.

I swarm by almighty god that the evidence I shall give is the truth and nothing but the truth.

However if you want to change someone’s mind, arguing with raw facts rarely works.

Because.

Beliefs are tied to emotion and safety, a person usually has to feel respected, safe, and socially secure before their brain will allow them to lower its defenses and accept a new truth.

When all of this comes to things like climate change it is no wonder we have had climate conferences after conferences.

Unfortunately these conferences focus on the symptoms rather than the cause.

We cannot invent our way out of climate change.

The truth and nothing but the truth is that climate change is now a product to be traded to the highest bidder.

New thechnogicale innovations will deepen the awaiting Catastrophes, because in this highly competitive industry there exists a deep ingrained subterranean culture of its own.

All human comments appreciated. All like clicks and abuse chucked in the bin.

Contact: bobdillon33@gmail.com

The Beady Eye says. If we are to avoid more wars. The redistribution of wealth must start now.

09 Thursday Jul 2026

Posted by in Uncategorized

≈ Comments Off on The Beady Eye says. If we are to avoid more wars. The redistribution of wealth must start now.

Tags

, , , , ,

( Four minute read)

We are living in a world of technological advancement, with inequality growing on a scale not seen since slavery was abolished.

We elect people to represent us, because only living entities have goals:

To find food, to reproduce, to survive, sometimes simply to experience good things. 

The tragedy is with the imminent arrival of General Artificial Intelligence it will be too late to do anything about the inequalities that exits, never mind what’s over the horizon.

———————-

Wealth is being weaponised, and the Ukraine war with Russia shows that standing armies are out of date.

Governments get weaker and weaker year upon year, eroding quicker than their manifesto.

Spending money they don’t have on futures that don’t understand or can ill afford to comprehend.

Because their tax returns are dismissing year upon year, as profit seeking algorithms that have no sources can make profits disappear into the cloud.

—————————-

We know that massive changes to employment are coming down the line.

To combat these changes redistribute of wealth must start now.

This can only be achieved by governments nationalising their countries sources of wealth and introducing with new laws governing compulsive purchases orders.

I am not talking about income. I am talking about property.

——————-

Proponents argue that extreme inequality hurts growth because the wealthy tend to save their money, whereas putting money into the hands of lower- and middle-class citizens immediately boosts consumer spending and drives the economy.

This is going to-be no longer the case

The biggest challenge in wealth redistribution is balancing equity (fairness) with efficiency (growth).

This argument is also with the current revolution in technology coming to a cull de sack.

Just look at Elon Musk or Donald Trump-

How grotesque it is to see one man owning trillions while the other lines his own pockets, while wasting billions of tax payers dollars.

—————————

There isn’t a single “best” way of achieving redistribution, because every method comes with trade-offs between economic equality and economic growth.

Collecting the money is only half the battle; how it is spent determines how effectively wealth is redistributed.

Taxes are enhireantly disliked and so complex that more money is spent on advoiding them than paying them.

———————

Instead of letting the market create extreme inequality and trying to fix it later via taxes, “pre-distribution” changes the rules of the economy so wealth is shared more evenly from the start.

Setting a legal floor for wages ensures workers take home a larger share of a company’s revenue.

Breaking up monopolies and fostering competition prevents massive corporations from artificially driving down wages or inflating prices for consumers.

—————————

While demand on Governments tax coffers shrinkand demand goes up exponentially.

The equality gap between the rich and poor widens year upon year.

The question is how to go about looking at fresh ways to raise the funds to bring assets back in public ownership.

They could be funded-by a lottery system

They could be funded-by new government bonds.

They could be funded by increasing the tax take on the extremely wealthy.

Elon Musk might have helped human consciousness to leave earth and enter space. However with his trillion he would, like others, need to have this consciousness prickled here on earth.

All human comments appreciated. All like clicks and abuse chucked in the bin.

Contact: bobdillon33@gmail.com

THE BEADY EYE SAYS TECHNOLOGY WHETHER WE LIKE IT OR NOT IS HERE TO STAY BUT ON WHO TERMS.

25 Thursday Jun 2026

Posted by in Uncategorized

≈ Comments Off on THE BEADY EYE SAYS TECHNOLOGY WHETHER WE LIKE IT OR NOT IS HERE TO STAY BUT ON WHO TERMS.

Tags

, , , , ,

( Ten minute read)

The above statement couldn’t be more true, and needs to be critical analysis sooner than later.

This is extremely important as we are moving rapidly towards a world of AI surveillance.

Artificial Intelligence’s is if we don’t get a grip of now ( not in the future) it’s going to rule the world we live on.

Its unchecked development with the rise of hyper-realistic deepfakes, automated text generation, and voice cloning is already out of control.

AI makes it incredibly cheap and easy to manufacture fake realities at scale.

When anything can be perfectly faked, trust in media, democratic elections, and institutional authority collapses entirely.

If citizens can no longer agree on objective reality, cohesive society becomes impossible to maintain.

A rogue actor or terrorist group could use AI to design a highly lethal, vaccine-resistant pathogen that would have previously required a state-sponsored lab and a team of virologists to engineer.

It’s time our governments wake up to reality’s of AI.

Just look at what’s happening in the Russia/ Ukraine war.

A war of drones against an unwinding army that needs, fuel, food, water, ammunition etc.

The integration of AI into military hardware creates autonomous weapons systems (killer robots) that can select and engage targets without human intervention eliminating human hesitation or mercy from the battlefield.

Furthermore, algorithmic bugs or rapid-fire escalation between opposing military AIs could trigger accidental wars before human commanders even realize what is happening.

Are we all so stupid that we are unable to see that the future will be run by a select few, if we don’t take action to regulate AI now it will not be possible to close the gate later.

Resistance is not futile.

We need laws to force companies to pull back the curtain on “black box” algorithms.

This means maintaining clear data provenance (knowing exactly what data was used to train the AI) and allowing independent third parties to audit systems for hidden bias or security flaws before they go public.

Deciding who is legally responsible when AI causes harm.

If an autonomous system misdiagnoses a patient or crashes a vehicle, liability frameworks establish whether the fault lies with the software developer, the data provider, or the end-user.

Because AI code doesn’t stop at national borders, global bodies (like the UN, G7, or international treaty organizations) must establish baseline safety floors.

This prevents “regulatory arbitrage,” where tech companies simply move their operations to countries with lax safety laws.

The “Pacing Problem”:

This is the core structural hurdle of AI regulation.

Technology develops exponentially, while traditional legislative and democratic lawmaking processes move linearly and slowly.

By the time a comprehensive law is debated, drafted, and passed, the underlying technology has often entirely changed.

To solve this, many experts advocate for agile governance—using living regulatory sandboxes where tech companies can test new models under close government supervision, allowing regulators to learn and adapt rules in real-time.

Or they are required to lodge a copy of the software governing any technology with a government held computer in order to receive a license to operate the software.

All human comments appreciated. All like clicks and abuse chucked in the bin.

Contact: bobdillon33@gmail.com

THE BEADY EYE SAYS. WE NOW FIND OURSELVES IN A WORLD WHERE WE KNOW HOW ALMOST EVERY THING WORKS, BUT WE KNOW THE MEANING OF NOTHING.

25 Thursday Jun 2026

Posted by in 2026 another year of change, Artificial intelligence, Artificial intelligence - AGI, Knowledge/ Currency, Uncategorized

≈ Comments Off on THE BEADY EYE SAYS. WE NOW FIND OURSELVES IN A WORLD WHERE WE KNOW HOW ALMOST EVERY THING WORKS, BUT WE KNOW THE MEANING OF NOTHING.

Tags

, , , ,

( Four minute read)

This hits right at the core of the modern human condition.

We are drowning in information, while starving for wisdom.” — E.O. Wild

We live in an era of unprecedented mechanical and scientific clarity.

If you want to know how something happens, humanity has an answer, or is actively coding one:

Our modern world is obsessed with optimization. We ask “How do we make this faster, smoother, or more productive?” instead of “Is this worth doing?”

We confuse knowing about something with actually knowing it. 

We can read the 3-billion-letter code of human DNA and literally edit it with CRISPR.

When everything is reduced to a metric or a function, things stop being sacred or deeply felt; they just become tasks to manage.

Thanks to AI and instant connectivity, raw knowledge has become a commodity.

It is practically free, infinite, and accessible to anyone with a screen.

Knowledge used to be a rare, premium currency.

The premium currency now belongs to those who can answer whether we should do it, and what it means for us.

When anyone can look up a fact, generate a functional line of code, or draft a legal contract in three seconds, simply possessing information loses its premium value.

In a world drowning in data, deep fakes, and AI-generated noise, the ability to separate truth from hallucination and signal from static is incredibly valuable.

Because knowledge is everywhere, the ability to focus deeply on one thing without getting distracted is becoming a rare, elite skill.

All human comments appreciated. All like clicks and abuse chucked in the bin.

Contact: bobdillon33@gmail.com

THE BEADY EYE SAYS: BECAUSE THE FOUNDATION OF ALL ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IS OUR COLLECTIVE INTELLIGENCE IT SHOULD BE OWN BY ALL OF US.

24 Wednesday Jun 2026

Posted by in Artificial Intelligence., Uncategorized

≈ Comments Off on THE BEADY EYE SAYS: BECAUSE THE FOUNDATION OF ALL ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IS OUR COLLECTIVE INTELLIGENCE IT SHOULD BE OWN BY ALL OF US.

Tags

, , ,

( Twelve minute read)

The question is. Are we going to allow the world to be run by a few rich people or are we going to nationalise the largest Ai companies.

Here is what Gemmi thinks

“At the moment we are looking at a messy, high-stakes tug-of-war between Big Tech’s corporate consolidation and aggressive government intervention.”

“Training state-of-the-art foundation models requires billions of dollars, massive data centers, and specialized chips (like NVIDIA’s GPUs).”

“Only a handful of mega-corporations (think Microsoft/OpenAI, Google, Meta, Amazon, and Apple) have the capital to compete at the absolute frontier.”

“These companies already own the platforms where humanity generates its data, giving them a perpetual loop to train and refine their models.”

“ If left entirely unchecked, this leads to a “closed” ecosystem where a few billionaires hold the keys to the most powerful productivity tools in human history.”

“Governments may well recognise that AI is not just a commercial product—it is national infrastructure, a geopolitical weapon, and a societal shift.”

“ The European Union’s EU AI Act is a prime example of governments setting hard boundaries on risk, copyright, and privacy.”

“ The US and China have also implemented sweeping executive orders and regulations targeting safety and national security.”

But to date there is little legislation.

“Instead of “nationalizing” private companies (which is politically difficult in capitalist economies), many governments are building or funding their own Sovereign AI.”

“Countries like France, Japan, India, and the UAE are actively investing public funds into localized, state-backed models so they don’t have to rely entirely on US-based tech giants.”

“Rather than a total corporate take-over or a full government nationalization, we are likely heading toward a highly regulated oligopoly—similar to how we treat defense contractors, utilities, or mega-banks…”

“ A few massive tech companies will likely continue to build the heaviest, most expensive infrastructure, but they will operate under strict government surveillance, mandatory safety audits, and heavy antitrust scrutiny. “

“ At the same time, a thriving ecosystem of open-source models and state-funded AI will ensure that basic AI capabilities remain accessible to “all and sundry.”

All very well. But the truth is below.

All human comments appreciated. All like clicks and abuse chucked in the bin.

Contact; bobdillon33@gmail.com

https://youtu.be/3qFxPUzcU9c?si=tI9Rmcxim40KKdQH

THE BEADY EYE SAYS Political decision-makers and the business world bear immense responsibility for a climate disaster that is already expressing itself in the current heat waves.

24 Wednesday Jun 2026

Posted by in Climate change, Uncategorized

≈ Comments Off on THE BEADY EYE SAYS Political decision-makers and the business world bear immense responsibility for a climate disaster that is already expressing itself in the current heat waves.

Tags

, , ,

( Four minute read)

As the Vert blog says and I quote

“ Those with the most malevolent intentions know they can count on our collective amnesia to continue accelerating down the highway to chaos.”

“ From one heatwave to the next, we forget what we endured a few months earlier .

This mechanism is vital, since it allows us to continue our lives (almost) normally. But it is also one of the reasons why so many of us continue to elect those who are leading us toward disaster.”

The Beady eye could not agree more, but what Vert had chosen to ignore is that climate change had been turned into a tradable product. Once this happened which has now been shown by gods knows Climate Summits it is virtual impossible to coordinate a unified approach.

So unfortunately we will continue with forest wild fires costing the tax payers billions, countries economy billions, not to mention the lost of lives and the billion of tonnes of extra carbon into the atmosphere.

This picture will remind the same until like most things in our world it is too late to do anything.

All human comments appreciated. All like clicks and abuse chucked in the bin.

Contact: bobdillon33@gmail.com

THE BEADY EYE SAYS, ITS A SAD WORLD THAT WE NOW LIVE ON AND IN.

23 Tuesday Jun 2026

Posted by in Artificial intelligence, State of the world, Uncategorized

≈ Comments Off on THE BEADY EYE SAYS, ITS A SAD WORLD THAT WE NOW LIVE ON AND IN.

Tags

, , , , , , ,

(Five minutes read)

We are now living in a world that has more than bleak outlook, on several fronts.

Climate change – Current wars- Artificial Intelligence.

In not so distant future the above three will cause mass migration not extinction.

We have a popular asshole president of the U. S. A.

Supporting a country while stating its ambitions for a greater Israel, has just pulled of a genocide with two fingers in the air to the rest of world.

We have the prospective of millions loosing their jobs.

We have Ai threatening to displace millions of jobs.

Been replaced by coded machine. Without any income, it doesn’t take much of an imagination to know what happens next.

We have over a million and half people refugees in the ongoing war in the Sudian.

We have talking heads everywhere who don’t know what their heads are talking about.

We have al-Qaeda -.Hezbollah – Isil Da’esh, Along with probably 50- 60 other groups.

We have one individual worth 1.2,trillion dollars.,

To put that in perspective, his wealth is equivalent to roughly 3% of the entire United States Gross Domestic Product (GDP), 

We have billions being spent on useless weapons.

We have around 9 billion mobile phone in the world.

We have enough plastic to bury ( around 10 billion tonnes)

There are an estimated 170 trillion microplastic particles floating in the oceans alone, which have now been detected in everything from global drinking water to human lungs.

We have up to 150 to 200 species of plants, insects, birds, and mammals go extinct every single day. 

We have well over 4,000 distinct religions and faith groups active in the world today.

With 160 major lottery operators across roughly 90 countries. 

We have 1.8 billion vechiels in the world

We have AI already coping itself to advoid being replaced.

The big question is.

Do we have the geeks and brainiacs now are now us to get on top of AI before it gets a consciousness.

Answer complement of Gemmi

“ We don’t know for sure, but if it does happen, the legal and ethical framework of the world will have to change completely.

To understand how this might play out, it helps to break it down into two parts: the science of the “mind” and the reality of the law.

But consciousness requires a physical, biological body, emotions driven by hormones, and millions of years of evolutionary survival instincts.

Or does it.

We got to appreciate that AI is uncontrollable.

The soon we accept this the better.

All human comments appreciated, All like clicks and abuse chucked in the bin,

Contact; bobdillon33@gmail.com