THE BEADY EYE SAYS WARS USE TO BE MAN AGAINST MAN, NO LONGER. WAR IS NOW DRONE AGAINST DRONE.

09 Friday Jan 2026

Posted by in Uncategorized, War

≈ Comments Off on THE BEADY EYE SAYS WARS USE TO BE MAN AGAINST MAN, NO LONGER. WAR IS NOW DRONE AGAINST DRONE.

Tags

, ,

Europe’s defense landscape—and its future thanks to the Russia/ Ukraine war is for all intent purposes, even with the NATO alliance is more or less worthless.

A five thousand euros drone can obliterate a fifty thousand tank costing ten times the amount of the drone.

Self-reliance has become the defining narrative for Ukraine’s sprouting defense industry.

New Ukrainian drones, once locked on a target, can use A.I. to chase and strike it.

The smaller the drone the more likely it will not be detected.

The amount of drones being manufactured in the Ukraine is mind boggling but China has emerged as a dominant drone power with major breakthroughs in hybrid and fixed-wing drones. …

The use of drones has changed the character of warfare with the zone in which ground forces are vulnerable to lethal attack extending to between

I honestly think large scale multi-nation total warfare may be a thing of the past. 

Non-violent warfare could also become quite common; attacks on electricity and utilities, hacking into government internet spaces and god forbid contaminations wars.

Hybrid warfare is constantly occuring, just no one has carried it over to the physical world, yet.

However if British troops & French are deployed on the ground in the Ukraine Russia drones will undoubtedly kill one of them. This will undoubtedly lead to the spread of the war over the Ukraine borders with Iran is on the threshold of a revolutionary war the future for wars is bright.

All human comments appreciated. All like clicks and abuse chucked in the bin.

Contact: bobdillon33@gmail.com.

https://youtu.be/49sgua4Cs-4?si=hJcf0Njgoot48L6t

THE BEADY EYE SAYS. WE HAVE SURROUND THE EARTH WITH SATELLITES. HERE TO DAY GONE TO MORROW.

09 Friday Jan 2026

Posted by in Earth Communications, Uncategorized

≈ Comments Off on THE BEADY EYE SAYS. WE HAVE SURROUND THE EARTH WITH SATELLITES. HERE TO DAY GONE TO MORROW.

Tags

, , , ,

( Six minute read)

It’s quite difficult to determine the exact number orbiting the Earth on a particular day, 14000 to 15000.

There are currently 111 satellites that are orbiting objects other than the Earth.

There were 639 launches in the first three months of 2025.

While you are probably thinking that it’s amazing that we have almost 15 000 satellites are orbiting the Earth, not all of them are working.

There are a significant number that have gone wrong, run out of fuel, or got to the end of their life.

They were simple left up in space or expected to go into a decaying orbit and eventually come back to Earth.

There are almost 4 000 useless metal objects above our heads travelling at up to 28 000 kilometres an hour!

Once one of them goes off course and crashes into another it will cause a domino effect.

Just imagine what will happen on earth. The collapse of all communication.

One of the great challenges will be how is responsible when they start to break up into metal rain.

A solar flare could damage all the electronics in orbiting satellites, disrupting navigation and communications systems, as well as the GPS time synchronisation that the internet relies on to function.

All human comments appreciated. All like clicks and abuse chucked in the bin.

Contact: bobdillon33@gmail.com

https://youtu.be/HlNKj0K_3FY?si=IKDSWsXJi9hUIwjk

https://youtube.com/shorts/M0C4wl-HIIM?si=i9bXwKdox3Ma5sX4

THE BEADY EYE SAYS GOVERNANCE IS BECOMING MORE BY REALITY TV, ALGO

09 Friday Jan 2026

Posted by in Realty TV / Social Media, Uncategorized

≈ Comments Off on THE BEADY EYE SAYS GOVERNANCE IS BECOMING MORE BY REALITY TV, ALGO

Tags

, , , , , ,

From reality TV screens to the halls of power, have we traded substance for spectacle in choosing our leaders?

Reality television has not only shaped our views but has also become a pipeline for political power.

It might be a deliberate tool to make people easier to manipulate and control.

It desensitize us to drama and distract us from the real issues facing the world. 

The rise of Donald Trump, a reality TV star turned president, is the most glaring example. 

—————————

It has transformed what should be serious political discourse into a social media spectacle that perfectly encapsulates our current democratic crisis.

The mechanics are straightforward:

Generate controversy, dominate media cycles, and use the attention to advance political objectives without democratic scrutiny.

So billionaires ego battles have replaced substantive policy discourse as the primary mechanism of political engagement.

Online spaces are designed for fast content consumption, rather than meaningful political debate, which is fuelling social conflict. 

The short-form nature of many online interactions can result in miscommunication, misunderstanding and warping of debated topics that result in unproductive political discussion.

All human comments appreciated. All like clicks and abuse chucked in the bin.

Contact: bobdillon33@gmail.com

THE BEADY EYE SAYS. DONALD TRUMP IS EXPOSING THE WEAKEST OF OUR WORLD ORGANISATIONS

07 Wednesday Jan 2026

Posted by in Donald Trump, Uncategorized

≈ Comments Off on THE BEADY EYE SAYS. DONALD TRUMP IS EXPOSING THE WEAKEST OF OUR WORLD ORGANISATIONS

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , ,

Abducting – Acquiring – stealing – looting – annexing.

( Ten minute read)

Europe stands at a precipice.

Following the US military operation in Venezuela, President Donald Trump and his close advisers have reiterated that Greenland – currently an autonomous territory of Denmark –  will be next.,

These are not random provocations but coordinated pressure tactics against a sovereign territory.

Threats against NATO members (such as Denmark) could also embolden Russia even more and lead to more uncertainty for Europe.

So why are European leaders not more forcefully calling out Trump’s threats against Greenland – as well as his government’s shocking intervention in Venezuela?

And what’s at stake?

European leaders have been forced to confront a reality they hoped to avoid: the US, NATO’s founding member, may become the alliance’s gravest threat.

But they don’t articulate any solid counter-threat to Trump’s comments.

They could, for instance, have reiterated their long-term partnership, the potential collapse of the biggest alliance in human history, or the costs in losing cooperation (both economic and security) with Europe that directly benefits the US.

Such equivocation on the most basic, foundational concept of international law not only signals incredible weakness. It also undermines Europe’s credibility when invoking the “rules-based order” against Russia and its actions in Ukraine, making it near impossible to mobilise Global South support, sustain sanctions coalitions, or claim principled restraint.

When European leaders respond so cautiously to the Venezuela operation – stressing respect for international law while avoiding direct criticism of Washington – their principles are exposed as highly selective.

Russia understands this dynamic perfectly. Moscow has already characterised US actions as ” armed aggression ” while pointing to Western hypocrisy.

Moscow benefits from this in fundamental ways.

First, Western hypocrisy validates Russia’s narrative that international law is merely a tool the powerful use against the weak.

The vacillation on condemning US action in Venezuela or threats against fellow NATO members contradicts the European narrative against Putin’s war.

Second, NATO’s potential collapse or paralysis would hand Moscow a strategic victory that Russian military power alone has been unable to secure.

If the United States annexes Greenland, Denmark would face an existential choice: accept the violation and remain in a compromised NATO or leave an alliance that no longer protects its members.

All other members would face the same choice.

The NATO alliance cannot function if its members no longer share fundamental values about sovereignty and law.

Trump has forced Europe to confront whether it will defend these principles universally or accept a world where might makes right.

Will Europe leaders be prepared to confront their own hypocrisy or timidly accept the erosion of the rules they claim to defend?

Your Guess is as good as mine

Around the world we are excusing dishonesty.

All human comments appreciated. All like clicks and abuse chucked in the bin.

Contact: bobdillon33@gmail.com

THE BEADY EYE SAYS. MADURO ADDUCTION SHOWS THAT INTERNATIONAL LAW IS A JOKE.

04 Sunday Jan 2026

Posted by in international law, Uncategorized

≈ Comments Off on THE BEADY EYE SAYS. MADURO ADDUCTION SHOWS THAT INTERNATIONAL LAW IS A JOKE.

Tags

, , , , ,

( Ten minute read)

Is there really such a thing as “international law,” if there are no actual written, legislated and binding statutes constituting it?

Sadly, this is why international law is a joke.

Countries don’t have army’s to uphold any laws other than laws within their own borders.

The history of our species unfortunately is full of violence and will remain so. But ultimately it comes down to how you define things.

The first difficulty we have is effectively defining ‘what is a law’.

There are lots of competing definitions and descriptions for what a law really is.

But whilst I don’t think there is a universally agreed concept, most people regress to the ‘command of the state’ concept.

If that is so, then international law is clearly not ‘law’ in that sense – it does not represent the command of any state.

The second problem we have is the whole question of ‘what is the substantive content international law’ is actually pretty fuzzy.

The boundaries and the detailed rules are far from clear. So we are not even certain what it is we are trying to find a definition for.

International law lacks many of the keys concepts that we traditionally associate with the term ‘law’:

  • the rules do not represent the command of any state or sovereign
  • there is no tribunal with original jurisdiction to adjudicate upon the rules
  • most international laws only exist because the parties have voluntarily subjected themselves to them
  • there is no penalty or sanction for breach or non-compliance – ‘remedies’ in international law tend to be of the self-help nature where they even exist, but countries do not get ‘fined’ or ‘sent to jail’
  • In most cases, the parties who are bound by the rules can cease to be bound by those rules at their own election by withdrawing from the relevant.
  • The truth is and has always been the powerful do as they please. 
  • The best views, think of international law like a handshake agreement amongst friends.
  • How do you force your friends to hold up their end of things? Except not everybody making the deals are friends.

The US is just taking it as a given that it has de facto jurisdiction over the nations of Syria, Iraq, and Iran, and now Venezuel.

Any attempt to interfere in its authority in the region is an unprovoked attack which must be defended against.

This is completely backwards and illegitimate.

Only through the most perversely warped American supremacist reality tunnels can it look valid to dictate the affairs of sovereign nations on the other side of the planet and respond with violence if anyone in those nations tries to eject them.

MADURO might be an evil person ( he is far from the first) but this doesn’t give any country the right to enter an other sovereign nation without consequences.

The seizure of Nicolás Maduro from his country in the middle of the night might have violated various domestic and international laws, but it was not at odds with America’s historic willingness to bend all kinds of rules in its own backyard

All human comments appreciated. All like clicks and abuse chucked in the bin.

Contact: bobdillon33@gmail.com

THE BEADY EYE ASKS:

04 Sunday Jan 2026

Posted by in Sustaniability, Technology v Humanity, Uncategorized

≈ Comments Off on THE BEADY EYE ASKS:

Tags

, , , ,

WHERE IS THE INTERSECTION OF TECHNOLOGY, POWER, CULTURE?

( Ten minute read)

At its core, culture is the vibrant, shared understanding of how we live, behave, and believe. It encompasses traditions, values, languages, art, and societal norms, essentially acting as the invisible framework that shapes our collective identity. 

In today’s fast-evolving world, the blend of culture and technology defines the success of digital transformation initiatives across industries. But without a cultural shift that promotes learning and adaptation, even the best technology can encounter pushback.

Let’s be clear, there is no going back, nothing exists in isolation.

This has given rise to new challenges and opportunities, reshaping how organizations operate, engage, and innovate.

The dispersal of information via digital technology can fundamentally change the ways in which cultures view and interact with other cultures.

Artists are using technology as a tool for creative expression, pushing the boundaries of traditional artistic mediums.

The intersection of art and technology holds both cultural and creative potential.

Collaboration between art and science drives innovation and advances in both fields.

While we’re waiting for the next moonshot to save the planet or the next billionaire to go bust, we won’t much notice that our chicken wings are being delivered by a robot.

———————

The fact that people are tiring of relentless centralisation, and are looking for new ways to gather and organise is perhaps the most obvious point of intersection.

People working with machines; Polarisation and decentralisation; Inequality; and Regulatory entanglements there is plenty of overlap between those topics within the world of technology.

It seems motivated by a desire to find new ways of distributing power and assets in the face of climate injustice, deepening poverty, and financial exclusion.

So these social shifts seemed more significant to us than any of the technical attributes.

Three decades of the World Wide Web have made it much easier for large numbers of people to find affinity with people who share their beliefs.

Digital platforms have amplified the dissemination of cultural values, allowing societies to share practices and traditions across borders.

However we must be aware that we are a part of nature not apart from it. In nature power is not always loud.

All human comments appreciated. All like clicks and abuse chucked in the bin.

Contact: bobdillon33 @bobdillon33

https://youtu.be/aq7Rm0nAw1E?si=4MSgzBS4PFYxneB8

THE BEADY EYE ASKS. HOW MUCH LONGER IS THE WORLD GOING TO PUT UP WITH DONALD DUMP.

03 Saturday Jan 2026

Posted by in 2026 another year of change, Donald Trump Presidency., Uncategorized

≈ Comments Off on THE BEADY EYE ASKS. HOW MUCH LONGER IS THE WORLD GOING TO PUT UP WITH DONALD DUMP.

Tags

, , ,

( Eight minute read)

Mr. T will get rid of himself in fairly short order, although not before he has done severe damage that it seems to me is likely will take decades to unwind.

The most likely.

His conflict of interest issues will become so catastrophic that America congress will reluctantly try to force him to correct them.

He will get irritated at having to fulfill the unavoidable duties and responsibilities of the Presidency and will resign in irritation.

He will do something so obviously and patently illegal that the American people, including some of his supporters, will rise up and demand he be impeached.

He will resign in a fit of pique.

He will resign in anger.

Gods forbid he is bump off.

——————

But here’s what really gets me about this question.

Say you get rid of him, then what?

Vance?

You’re trading a dumpster fire for an atomic bomb. Vance isn’t the bumbling buffoon that Trump is. ,

Trump talks a good game but Vance is just plain nuts. And he’s patient. He knows Trump is old and probably won’t finish his term. This guy is a zealot.

People are forgetting this small detail, no Trump, he’s next in the chain of command.

Be very careful what you wish for.

Because sometimes they come true.

The question remains.

How long are Americans going to put up with this madman they have as president (dictator)?

I liken him to a chronic, cancerous, inoperable malignancy which kills slowly.

It’s not like that we can just ignore him and he’ll go away. His rhetoric dehumanizes those who justifiably loathe him.

He has single-handedly inflamed his minions to a homicidal level.

Getting rid of him can be interpreted a few different ways.

It could mean assassinating him, which the wording of the question seems to imply.

It could mean he loses the next presidential election, although that would certainly not result in his fading into obscurity.

It could also mean a conviction on some or all of the criminal charges pending against him resulting in his well-deserved imprisonment.,

Don’t doubt for a moment that he knows, legally, he’s virtually invulnerable.

This situation is extremely unstable and dangerous.

I am curious how many people remember he stated he would end the war’s in Ukraine and Gaza within 24 hours of taking office, Mexico would pay for his wall , the migrants are eating people’s cat’s and dog’s , and he would make Americans wealthy by bringing industry from the rest of the world to the United States of America.

He has ordered his army into America’s towns and cities to eradicate crime and has set out to deport millions of low paid worker’s from the United States without considering who will replace them.

He has started a trade war with the rest of the world without thinking how the world outside of the United States will react and blames every country outside of the United States for his country’s problems.

He has insulted and threatened his country’s friends and millitary allies and even suggested Russia is free to attack any NATO member country that hasn’t spent SUGGESTED 2% of it’s GDP on it’s own defence.

Now he has in the last 72,hours stirred up a hornet nest in Venezuela.

The long and short of it is that he thinks of no one but himself, does whatever he feels like doing, is accountable to no one, and thinks he’s the most magnificent thing since Jesus. 

All comments appreciated. All like clicks and abuse chucked in the bin.

Contact: bobdillon33@gmail.com

https://youtube.com/shorts/3hy_yUkmqPI?si=TFMece5_ibQOsU-r

THE BEADY EYE ASKS: IS THERE ANYONE OUT THERE WHO KNOWS WHERE ALL OF THIS TECHNOLOGY IS GOING.

02 Friday Jan 2026

Posted by in Uncategorized

≈ Comments Off on THE BEADY EYE ASKS: IS THERE ANYONE OUT THERE WHO KNOWS WHERE ALL OF THIS TECHNOLOGY IS GOING.

( Three minute read)

As far as I can tell there’s a new discovery every day especially in the medical field, which is more than exciting.

However democracy is being lost in a barrage of social media, capitalism profiteering (which is disappearing into the cloud) with power becoming knowledge and drones.

The truth is that we have no idea what coming and that’s just with AI not to mention Climate change.

Either one will cause wars.

———————-

With scams enriched the pockets of algorithm crooks we are all becoming digital do doe’s.

Here is a scam that is netting ( what is supposed to be a replicable organisation – . Credit Agriculture ) billions.

This time however it’s different.

This scam is in broad daylight in the form of insurance agains the fraudulent use of ones credit cards.

Credit Agriculture is charging its clients ( There are over 40 million world wide) a fee of 10.50 euros ( which they say is mandatory) for insurance on its credit cards.

Given that French federal law limits credit card fraud liability and that most credit cards offer a “Zero Liability” policy, credit card loss protection insurance doesn’t offer any additional benefits.

Surely the price for the insurance is included in the price you pay to get the credit card in the first place.

This is a classic example of a big organisation taking advantage of individuals.

It can only be described as daylight robbery.

What’s on the line here is trust.

How can one trust a bank not to help itself to your hard earned money, if it is allowed to take a cent without any permission from the account holder.

There is no point in having an account.

——————-

I felt powerless as we are now at a point where we are going to be forced to examine everything because of AI.

We all must learn how to fight back and stop this platent abuse of trust.

You can’t fight it if you can’t see it.

All human comments appreciated. All like clicks and abuse chucked in the bin.

Contact: bobdillon33@gmail.com

https://youtu.be/HjQJBoiOLbc?si=CXHtKS-43ZQcE5Qu

https://youtube.com/shorts/MkZ-W21jkcc?si=WMs7ygO0ZpUCXbZz

THE BEADY EYE SAYS: From Economics, to what is needed for life is provided by NATURE, it will not by Artificial Intelligence.

02 Friday Jan 2026

Posted by in 2026 another year of change, A Constitution for the Earth., Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence., Uncategorized

≈ Comments Off on THE BEADY EYE SAYS: From Economics, to what is needed for life is provided by NATURE, it will not by Artificial Intelligence.

Tags

, , , ,

( Seven minute read)

The question is when are we and our governments going to realise the above or is AI going to take over?

If an artificial intelligence were to map and replicate your behavior, way of speaking and personality with extremely high precision, would we be able to differentiate the human from the machine?

Artificial intelligence have given new dimensions to some of humanity’s oldest questions.

Who are we? What makes us human? What is reality?

We feel that we are fundamentally different from machines, but as they become more sophisticated and familiar, these boundaries blur and it becomes alarmingly difficult to clearly separate ourselves from artificial intelligence.

We already have video, voice, and text emulating people based on historical data. We only lack the physical robot, and it won’t take long to arrive.

I haven’t seen any satisfactory answers to these questions yet, but I believe we’ll have to find them quickly if we want to coexist peacefully and securely with AI, which is growing impetuously and is likely to occupy an increasingly prominent place in society. 

As artificial intelligence evolves, is it possible for it to reach a level of morality and perfection above humans, who are inherently flawed?

In that case, would it be wiser for us to be governed by AI, rather than the other way around? 

Feelings and emotions are a pivotal part of being human, but to what extent is altering these phenomena also part of the human experience?

Emphaty is what sets humans apart from androids.,

But can’t empathy be taught and emulated by artificial intelligence, just like all emotions?

Those interacting with it will perceive only the manifestations of human emotions, never knowing if they are innate or emulated.

The ability to apply life experiences to understand current challenges, make decisions, and navigate complex situations.

AI, on the other hand, doesn’t have experience—it has data.

Artificial Intelligence won’t replace humans, but it will redefine what it means to be human.

Artificial Intelligence is no longer a futuristic fantasy, it’s the pulse of a new civilisation that will have no alternative but to protect the environment from exploitation for profit?

———————-

Yes we have mega cities, artificial intelligence, weapons to wipe each other of the face of the globe. Nature has provided all of it.

Everything in nature is for free.

However we pay money for things our ancestors would have dedicated days, hours, and lifetimes towards.

I’d take it one step further and say that the concept of something being “free” or not, isn’t real. Its a human-made concept that has no meaning in nature.

Nature does not squander energy.

We are now standing at a point in the evolution of our species that will redefine what is meant to be human.

The boundaries between being human or half artificial are becoming blurred.

The world remains in a protracted interregnum, still unsettled, fragmenting, but no less contested. 

All human comments appreciated. All like clicks and abuse chucked in the bin.

Contact: bobdillon33@gmail.com

https://youtu.be/AdEf1p7KvjY?si=nivo6kNbwZ1JsGT5

https://youtu.be/_XUkw3zj7uk?si=kxmRqe7k6rOGO_6S

THE BEADY EYE SAYS. WE MUST STOP FLUSHING CHEMICALS INTO OUR FRESH WATER AND OUR OCEANS.

01 Thursday Jan 2026

Posted by in Pollution, Uncategorized

≈ Comments Off on THE BEADY EYE SAYS. WE MUST STOP FLUSHING CHEMICALS INTO OUR FRESH WATER AND OUR OCEANS.

Tags

,

Every aspect of our daily lives, from the food we consume to the vehicles we use, influences the health of our world.

The harsh chemicals in many cleaning products come with an invisible price tag—polluting our water, air, soil, and climate long after we rinse them away.

A splash of bathroom cleaner here, a squirt of kitchen spray there.

It’s such a routine part of life that we rarely pause to think about what happens after we’ve scrubbed, rinsed, and moved on with our day. 

Every day we flush MILLIONS OF LITRES of contaminated water down our sinks, toilets,, we put washing tablets in our washing machines, dish washer, wipe our kitchen tops, floors, windows, wash our cars with products that all contain some chemical.

Many of the most popular and well-known cleaning products, toiletries and cosmetics contain ingredients that are / can be harmful to the environment.

This industry is supported by an advertising industry that promotes these products with little attention to what they do to the environment.

The introduction of these chemicals into waterways can lead to:

Eutrophication: Excess nutrients, such as phosphates, can cause algal blooms that deplete oxygen levels, leading to dead zones where aquatic life cannot survive.

Pre- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a large, complex group of synthetic chemicals that have been used in consumer products around the world since about the 1950s.

There are thousands of variations in PFAS chemicals.

For example, PFAS are used to keep food from sticking to packaging or cookware, make clothes and carpets resistant to stains, and create firefighting foam that is more effective.

PFAS molecules have a chain of linked carbon and fluorine atoms.

Because the carbon-fluorine bond is one of the strongest, these chemicals do not degrade easily in the environment.

All of these products should be (under law ) summited to be tested to certify they are environmental friendly.

This could be done by the United Nations, costing nothing as a fee could be charged to qualify for the certification.

Once certified they would carry an environmental stamp.

It’s time to clean responsibly. It’s time to clean smarter.

All human comments appreciated. All like clicks and abuse chucked in the bin.

Contact: bobdillon33@gmail.com