Category Archives: Uncategorized

THE BEADY EYE ASKS: IS IT TRUE THAT THE BRITISH MONARCHY CANNOT BE SCRUTINISE BY PARLIAMENT.

05 Thursday Mar 2026

Posted by in The Royal Monarchy, Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

,

( Three minute read)

With the Esptine files we hear,

“ Nobody is above the law.”

The King reigns, but he does not rule however as monarchy.

King Charles is protected by sovereign immunity, a constitutional principle exempting him from all criminal and civil liability.

He is the UK head of state and head of the Commonwealth. His powers are largely symbolic and ceremonial,

It is effectively ministers who exercise the royal prerogative. And it is, in reality, the prime minister who appoints, accepts the resignations of and dismisses ministers, but ruling is done by his government, and as head of state in the UK the King is constitutionally obliged to follow the government’s advice.

So if his government decided to abolish the monarchy does he have to comply ?

It’s a political quagmire.

His main functions as head of state are to appoint the Prime Minister, and all the other ministers; to open new sessions of parliament; and to give royal assent to bills passed by parliament, signifying that they have become law. 

There is no scrutiny of the Royal family in parliament as they are rarely in parliament. The monarch is not allowed to enter the house of commons (a historic rule dating back to king Charles I)

Dissolving parliament ahead of an election is a prerogative power of the monarch.

In practice, the monarch only dissolves parliament at the request of the government.

The British Monarchy is known as a constitutional monarchy.

This means that, while The Sovereign is Head of State, the ability to make and pass legislation resides with an elected Parliament.

The royal prerogative includes the powers to appoint and dismiss ministers, regulate the civil service, issue passports, declare war, make peace, direct the actions of the military, and negotiate and ratify treaties, alliances, and international agreements.

All human comments appreciated. All like clicks and abuse chucked in the bin.

Contact: bobdillon33@gmail.com

THE BEADY EYE SAYS. THE LACK OF CRITICAL THINKING IS BECOMING LETHAL.

05 Thursday Mar 2026

Posted by in Uncategorized, 2020: The year we need to change., Critical thinking

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

,

( Seven minute read)

We don’t have to look far to see a prime example of this with the War in the Middle East.

We all know that history shows us that it is easy to start a war, never mind to stop it spreading, or to negotiate an end.

With current world leaders like the Donald Trump and Putin ( Which is scary to say the least) Critical Thinking appears to be might without any evidence of humanity.

———————

The wealth of communications and information can easily overwhelm our reasoning abilities.

In an age of computers, video games, and the Internet, there’s a growing question about how technology is changing critical thinking and whether society benefits from it.

It’s largely a product of our own invention—and a subjective one at that.

A greater focus on visual media exacts a toll, with creativity and critical thinking landing in a mushy swamp somewhere between perception and reality; measurable and incomprehensible.

Although technology alters the way we see, hear, and assimilate our world—the act of thinking remains decidedly human.

What’s more.

It’s ironic that with ever-growing piles of data and information it doesn’t equate to greater knowledge and better decision-making. 

Developing our abilities to think more clearly, richly, fully—individually and collectively—is absolutely crucial [to solving world problems.

Computer technology has enhanced lives in countless ways, but the ability to think for oneself is in slow demise, not a sudden death.

We get comfortable with our choices, beliefs, and assumptions and are surrounded by people who agree with us.

The internet curate content that reinforces our existing beliefs. Confirmation bias makes us feel validated, even if we’re miles from the truth.

It’s so easy to get lost in digital chaos.

Purposeful and reflective judgment about what to believe or what to do in response to observations, experience, verbal or written expressions, or arguments.

Overlay technology and that’s where things get complex. “We can do the same critical-reasoning operations without technology as we can with it—just at different speeds and with different ease.

Critical thinking is a muscle, and like any muscle, it needs exercise.

But we’re not exercising it enough.

We are overwhelmed by a constant barrage of devices and tasks.

Worse:

We increasingly suffer from the Google syndrome. People accept what they read and believe what they see online is fact when it is not.

Unfortunately, most visual media are real-time media that do not allow time for reflection.

We’re too quick to accept information at face value. We’re more interested in headlines than understanding the objective truth.

Everything is suddenly getting worse. 

It’s everywhere. In politics. Corporate systems. Government institutions so we’re entering living in permanent uncertainty.

Technology is changing the way we approach complex problems and conundrums, and making it more difficult to really think.

One thing is certain.

The United States, a country with a long history of democracy, is heading toward authoritarianism at a dizzying pace, literally day by day.

Autocracy, and toxic leaders in general, can be very attractive, especially to people who feel victimised.

When the USA elected Donald Dump Americans, the benefit of doubt they did not realize that they were electing not only a new leader but inadvertently ushering in a new form of government.

And this is why critical thinking is so important in real life,.

Plato and Aristotle both wrote about how the passions can influence our thinking.

Perhaps, after all these centuries, it is time to take their message seriously.

All human comments appreciated. All like clicks and abuse chucked in the bin.

Contact: bobdillon33@gmail.com

THE BEADY EYE SAYS. TRUTH IS A CRUCIAL VALUE THAT DEFINES OUR HUMANITY.

04 Wednesday Mar 2026

Posted by in Truth, Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

( THREE MINUTE READ)

The search for truth is never ending.

In order to survive, humans need to know the truth about the world.

Truth has always been contested throughout history and never more so than these days within totalitarian regimes.

It is been corrupted by plagiarists and counterfeits, and now commonly manipulated by online trolls/ and algorithms.

Because:

Information circulating systems have been steadily evolving away from all aspects that gave us the ability to decern context and origin from what we experience.

Truth is not limited to a specific society or ideology,

There is a possibility and danger that truth will disappear from our life as a factor or as something that matters.

Not just here or there but everywhere.

This is at the heart of the crisis we now face in a world full of verbal social media dihirrs

A world of scams where it necessary not just to trust incoming phone calls but where verification of what one sees is required for news to believe.

This is becoming more and more urgent.

Its value once served as a kind of glue in our civilisation, codified through religious documents, constitutions, systems of law, family teachings, philosophical theories and more.

It is essential for their survival and flourishing, and to achieve the instrumental benefits of truth, humans have to cooperate, to play an active role in acquiring true knowledge and share it with others.

One of the things that distinguish us as humans is the value we assign to knowledge of the world for its own sake, not just for practical advantage, but also for theoretical understanding.

With the outbreak of war across the Middle East we look at the greatest point of danger in the realms of truth.

All human comments appreciated. All like clicks and abuse chucked in the bin.

Contact: bobdillon33@gmail.com

THE BEADY EYE SAYS WHAT MORE EVIDENCE DO WE NEED THAT INTERNATIONAL LAW IS A JOKE.

03 Tuesday Mar 2026

Posted by in international law, Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

( Three minute read)

The legality of preemptive strikes in international law remains one of the most debated and controversial issues in global relations.

The legal tension lies in balancing a country’s right to defend itself with the prohibition of the use of force.

There is and always been a thin line between legitimate self-defense and unlawful aggression.

A preemptive strike refers to a military attack initiated on the belief that an enemy is planning an imminent offensive.

This doctrine, is no longer rooted in the idea of self-defense.

The United Nations Charter, which governs the use of force among countries is out of date.

The charter emphasises the right to self-defense arises only after an actual armed attack.

Therefore, any military action taken in anticipation of an attack—that is, a preemptive strike—sits outside the clear language of Article 51 and is thus, by default, presumed to be illegal under the current framework.

We now have countless interpretation by many countries with various ways to justify their actions.

For example:

The preemptive strike is lawful if the threat is imminent, overwhelming, and leaves no alternative but to act.

However, this standard is inherently subjective and open to interpretation, leading to inconsistencies in its application.

In contrast to preemptive strikes, the concept of preventive war—striking to prevent a potential future threat that is not immediate—is more widely considered illegal.

The law, was created in the aftermath of World War II.

With the evolution of modern threats, particularly terrorism and the potential for rogue states or non-state actors to acquire WMDs the debate over the legitimacy of preemptive strikes is turned into preemptive self-defense.

No one is going to wait for a nuclear or biological weapons to be fired.

Therefore, some legal theorists and policymakers advocate for a reinterpretation of Article 51 to include imminent threats based on credible intelligence.

However, this approach risks undermining the entire international legal order by creating loopholes that powerful countries can exploit.

If countries are allowed to define “imminent threat” on their own terms, the door opens to abuse and pretextual wars. 

The UN Charter is outdated, and ill equipped to handle 21st-century security threats, depending on objectivity, predictability, and shared norms, all of which are eroded by unilateral decisions to strike first.

Most cases of preemptive strikes, lack clear evidence of imminent danger and often result in long-term conflict which we are going to see in the case of the Iran – Us – Israel, not to mention Russia attack on the Ukraine.

All human comments appreciated. All like clicks and abuse chucked in the bin.

Contact: bobdillon33@gmail.com.

THE BEADY EYE OPEN LETTER TO THE NEXT GENERATION.

02 Monday Mar 2026

Posted by in Uncategorized, Open letter to the next generation

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , , , ,

THIS IS WHAT WE ARE LEAVING YOU.

A majestic world of beauty that has evolved over billions of year.

Populated by eight billion of us called humans, living alone side 9 million animal species, and 6 million insects species.

510 million km2 that’s 197 square miles, of which 29% is land and 71% water.

20% of this land is covered by roads 31% by forests, with around 1.5% covered by concrete.

There are microplastics everywhere.

197 counties, with 7000 odd languages, with 48,00 cities.

There are around 10,000 religions.

The whole lot is going around the sun at 65,000 miles per hour while spinning on its axis at about 1,000 miles per hour in a universe of infinite.

——————-

We are leaving you with the infancy of a new non organic species that will be needed to explore the universe.

We are leaving you with not just a planet but an atmosphere heating up threatening the very things that enables life.

We are leaving you with rampant inequality.

We are leaving you with corruption on a global scale, with Fascism on the rise.

We are leaving you with the ability to either destroy or save the planet against a meteorite strike.,

We are leaving you with a world where it might be cruel to have children.

Truth will become false and false will become true.

So rest assured the next generation has the same future as the previous one. Sadly dealing with unpredictable CHANGE will be your number one problem.

Just understand no one have perfect life.

People who preach you about perfect life are the dreamers who never had it.

Remember few only can create history and it need not be related to money always.

The curtain has been pulled back.

What happens next depends on what we do with what we now see.

We failed to teach you what is life.

Remember your AI digital girl friend will be untrustworthy.

Remember might is not always right.

Remember Earth has seen at least 6 different species of humans.

To day there is only one human species left called HOMO SAPIENS ( Wise Men)

Remember robots might transform the world for better or worse, they will not be accountable to your life and your actions.

As I write this blog an other war has started, empathising the fragility of humanity.

This is a hugely critical moment in humanity. Whether AI is harnessed to human values or not.

Yours Robert de Mayo Dillon.

All human comments appreciated. All like clicks and abuse chucked in the bin.

Contact: bobdillon33@gmail.com

https://youtu.be/rnnctj8qnw0?si=8loh3d7DWr86O8cU

THE BEADY EYE SAYS THAT WE ARE NOW LIVING IN A WORLD OF EXISTENCE NOT A WORLD OF LIVING.

28 Saturday Feb 2026

Posted by in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , , , ,

WE HAVE DESTROYED LIVING, REPLACING IT WITH A WORLD OF EXISTENCE.

We now have a way world, with widening polarisation ideologies, conflict, corruption, failed states, refugees, rampant levels of mental health issues, loneliness, family breakdown, drugs, fraught younger generations, environmental devastation and artificial intelligence.

HOW HAS THIS HAPPENED?

SET ON THE FOUNDATION OF CAPITALIST GREED and the world can’t deny this for much longer.

Unless we move away from the inequality of 99% of the population working to make 1% richer, we’re going to see no end to conflict, never mind a purpose for living.

We were given a computer brain, but no program for it.

Humanity is therefore a virtue, linked with altruistic ethics, derived from the human condition, but it is on the precipice of shattering Earth’s limits.

We are bombarded each day with rhetoric designed to make us feel guilty about being human. It’s one of the more poisonous aspects of modern  day living it’s affects us all at some point.

Each generation adapts to survive in its own time and accepts that as normal.

Our survival as a species won’t come about because of politicians or scientists, it will be the inherent wisdom of people who continue to live life on the margins.

We need to understand that we are not in control of our species’ future. There are forces far more powerful that determine this.

For example our reluctance to recognise the awesome power of nature, confounds our inability accept the need to protect it.

The truth is, our existence will sooner be eroded by the cumulative effects of lots of tint, incremental damages to wildlife and nature.

With mental health problems, with millions living on social, humanity is on the ground, with no way for the majority of us to have a life without being able to buy it.

Popularism is on the rise with more and more of us living the closed doors of smart phones.

The economy is supposed to provide services in exchange for out labour.

As tax revenues are shrinking these services are been cut year on year.

The solution is to scrap Benefits and replace them with a Basic Income sufficient to let people look after themselves.

This is more urgent with AI algorithms plundering the world for short term profits.

It’s a bleak future with over a dozen current wars which will drive millions of more refugees / migrants.

We all been spoon fed by a media that is turning everything in a form of entertainment.

The only way to get at the truth seems to be down the barrel of a gun.

All human comments appreciated. All like clicks and abuse chucked in the bin.

Contact: bobdillon33&gmail.com

https://youtube.com/shorts/eHn7vwO0QCA?si=fgHmH-wmjaMmUpZk

THE BEADY EYE SAYS. YOU ARE LIVING IN THE FINAL DAYS OF WHAT IS CALLED FREEDOM.

26 Thursday Feb 2026

Posted by in Freedom, Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

( Seven minute read)

I read somewhere how we basically have no freedoms at all, going all the way to our births, being born without our consent and all that follows.

Does that mean that death is the only true freedom then? 

——————

Now thinking about I don’t even know what freedom even means in regards to both life and death.

However there is a strange and beautiful clarity when you realise that the road ahead is much shorter when you’re older than longer when you’re were young.

It’s like a fog lifting and the first time you see the world as it is actually is, not as you were taught to see it.

You see that capitalism with profit seeking algorithms, are continuing to produce a system that is becoming more and more politically bankrupt, leading to the Esptine files.

These algorithms are destroying what’s left of freedom, making decisions in every part of one’s life, spreading selfishness at the core of their functions.

Even death these days feels forced and doesn’t feel like freedom cause as soon as we’re dead it’s not like we exist and be free to do whatever cause we’re dead.

Nature treats death with indifference. 

To see death as natural, banal, and even unremarkable is not to dismiss its emotional impact — but to restore it to its place within life, not above it.

It is not death that defines life, but how we live knowing it ends. The noise around death is ours, not nature’s.

——————-

Both feel like a prison we can’t escape.

Because we’re slaves to our needs.

We’re slaves moreover to the means that get us the things we need to survive, and to the people who hold them.

I think the only freedom we really get is the ability to free our minds and be able to observe what happens to us and around us with some level of detachment.

Unfortunately that’s a double edged sword as the more you understand, the more you realize how utterly blind, deluded and helpless humanity is as a whole.

What does it mean to survive — and at what cost?

Money limits our freedom of movement.

In a world where medical technology can prolong life indefinitely and where suffering often outlasts hope, the simple act of staying alive has become ethically complex and extremely expensive.

So the capacity to choose one’s attitude — the last of the human freedoms.

From an evolutionary perspective, survival is not a moral choice, but a program.

However we’re standing on the verge of a world without freedom, which like life is very fragile, fickle and in need of protection.

There were always choices to make.

“ Every day, every hour, offered the opportunity to make a decision, a decision which determined whether you would or would not submit to those powers which threatened to rob you of your very self, your inner freedom; which determined whether or not you would become the plaything of circumstance, renouncing freedom and dignity to become molded into the form of the typical inmate.” (Man’s Search for Meaning, p. 86-7).

Clearly this is freedom to give, which is freedom to be human in the higher sense of the word.

Thus, you are free when you are a subject, not an object, when you are self-determining, not determined. You are not attached, coerced or dependent on anyone or anything else. You are your “very self.”

On the other hand, we do also need our instincts, including our instinct for survival.

Instincts serve a good purpose providing they serve us and we don’t serve them.

There is a difference between mindless following and mindful consideration of need. In the first case you give up control. In the second your common sense is clearly in charge.

The freedom to choose your own way has to emerge from an inner freedom to be who you are not an algorithmic freedom.

All human comments appreciated. All like clicks and abuse chucked in the bin.

Contact: bobdillon33@ gmail.com

https://youtu.be/qxB5FiBIt1Y?si=zhE2tAK4CWDecXun

https://youtu.be/XJJlK8RBYVs?si=y9xVr36BwZtBv0yc

THE BEADY EYE SAYS: TO LIVE A REWARDING LIFE IS NOT THE ACCUMULATION OF MATERIAL WEALTH. MATERIAL WEALTH IS NOT THE B ALL AND END ALL OF ONE’S EXISTENCE.

25 Wednesday Feb 2026

Posted by in 2026 another year of change, CAPITALISM IS INCOMPATIBLE IN THE FIGHT AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE., Collective stupidity., Epstein files:, EPSTEIN QUAGMIRE., Human values., Inequality., King Charles., LIVE A LIFE WORTH WHILE, Money in Politics., Our Common Values., PAIN AND SUFFERING IN LIFE, Purpose of life., RIPOFFS, The essence of our humanity., The Obvious., The UK Class system., The year 2026., Truthfulness., Uncategorized, Wealth.

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

( Seven minute read)

The point of this life, Marcus Aurelius says, is to possess good character and do acts for the common good.

This is as parents, teachers etc, what we should be the aspiring to. To live by example.

Not by using positions for personal gain, greed, to the detriment of others.

This is especially true for those who are born into privilege, (not elected) in positions of trust, with power to govern on salaries pay by the tax payers.

Once trust is broken there is no longer trust in their ability to rule, never mind occupying any positions of authority or to be respected .

Surely it is time to scrap the Soap Opera called the Royal Family. Terminate it and replace it with, a republic, with a written constitution.

Why?

Because the Epstein files have exposed a culture of a self indulging upper class that after years of capitalism has little concept of the problems the world is facing. Never mind the serfs that the royals are supposed to be representing.

After paying millions in an effort to sweep under the carpet one of their privileged offspring sexually misdoings they are no longer believable, morally bankrupt.

Pretending that they have nothing to do with the Epstein trafficking of under age women is farcical.

The whole concept of Royalty and its privileges is totally out of date with a modern society.

———————-

People are beginning to understand that the whole Royal set up and the political system is corrupted by an elite group of rich with exchanges of e mails that are obviously connected toEpstein trafficking ring.,

England needs a new identity other than not God save a non elected King.

The King technically owns all the land in England, Wales and Northern Ireland.

When you buy land in the UK, you are really just buying a right to the land, a right that can be revoked at any time by the Crown (though in modern times this legal arrangement is largely irrelevant).

The Royal Family retains a significant ‘interest’ in the Crown Estate.

Oddly, though called the Crown Estate, this body represents the most independent of the land holdings linked to the King.

This entity is a £14.1 billion UK real estate businesswith a portfolio “unlike any other.

Its portfolio includes prime London real estate (it owns the building in which the Apple Store is located), lots of rural land, about half the UK’s coastline and all the surrounding seabed.

This entity used to be privately owned by the monarchy in the same sense as Sandringham or Balmoral.

Sandringham, for example, is a 20,000-acre estate. Balmoral is bigger still, covering roughly 50,000 acres.,

England is desperate to build new affordable housing.

The British tax payer are beginning to see a bunch of people called Royals (by birth ) with their noses in the tax throf paying hush money.

After 2019 it appears the queen and Charles continued to give Andrew an annual allowance from the Windsors’ private wealth, believed to be £1m a year.

————————

The monarch remains constitutionally empowered to exercise the royal prerogative against the advice of the prime minister or the cabinet.

For centuries, the government has provided financial support to the Monarch.

Since 2012/13, this has been known as the Sovereign Grant, as provided for under the Sovereign Grant Act 2011.

Parliament can abolish the monarchy overnight, if it wishes to.

Of course that’s not going to happen, for all sorts of reasons. But there is no constitution barrier to abolishing the monarchy.

———————-

Part of the rich life is being able to travel, being able to reduce hassle, to work on what you want to work on.

Another important thing is using your time and money to help other people.

That’s true wealth.

Indeed, you can be quite wealthy, but you will never be rich.

It has very little to do with how much you save for yourself, and everything to do with how much you spend for others..

https://youtu.be/b83uQ4yv_ug?si=EXqwBr07Q3HnXcAs

https://youtube.com/shorts/6Dx8347YG8U?si=CyakF4ueQokCL4A5

https://youtu.be/yiOvAgw4hwE?si=IjQWaoJ23tnJo0NI

THE BEADY EYE SAYS ITS IMPOSSIBLE TO ESCAPE FROM CAPITALISM, BUT ONCE WE START REPLACING REAL RELATIONSHIPS WITH ARTIFICIAL ONES THERE IS NO TURNING BACK.

25 Wednesday Feb 2026

Posted by in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

( Ten minute read)

As we peer into the future, we can anticipate a host of exciting trends and challenges that will influence the dynamics of our relationships.

The impact of technology in relationships and daily existence cannot be overstated, it is or its going to be profound

Because it is going to expose the true horror of human existence, along with the very fundamentals of what is real.

Because Smartphones, have evolved to become extensions of ourselves.

They not only serve as tools for communication but also as versatile companions in our daily routines.

—————

The ability to instantly share moments, thoughts, and emotions with friends and family, regardless of their physical location, is a testament to technology’s profound impact on relationships.

The result?

How we perceive humanity is changing.

Technology inadvertently divert our attention away from our partners.

Finding a balance between our digital lives and our personal connections has become more critical than ever.

If we only perceive humanity as a product it has only got an economic value. Another words there is nothing inherently special about humans.

This is why digital partnerships give a profound sense of togetherness, even when we are physically apart.

These shared experiences become the threads that weave the tapestry of our relationships, creating lasting memories and fostering emotional bonds that transcend the limitations of geography.

With reducing income to buy commodities we are trapped inside a system that has no moral values and we are witnessing history’s largest wealth transfer.

The impact of technology in relationships is set to deepen as these tools open new dimensions of togetherness.

—————-

One remarkable trend on the horizon is Virtual Reality (VR) and Augmented Reality (AR).

These immersive technologies are set to bridge the gap between the physical and digital worlds, enabling couples to virtually reunite, explore, and share experiences.

Unlike prior generations who focused on property and stocks, younger heirs are likely to invest in tokenised assets, digital currencies, and virtual economies.

Digital assets are no longer fringe considerations; they are central to identity and wealth.

This signals a future where digital assets will  be a larger part of financial planning, making digital estate planning not just relevant, but essential.

Technology can enhance your relationship ( like virtual date nights), and offering tools for relationship growth, such as apps for couple activities or relationship advice.

So why not bring back the dead by replaced the living with designer AI partners.

There is every reason to be more than worried that this is what is going to happen.

We all don’t have to be told that the world we live in and on is getting less to do with humanity and more to do with ( lack of a better word) Products.

Fuelled by profit seeking algorithms confusion and anxiety, scams are appearing daily, spreading faster than one can blink.

Driven by I am all right Jack syndrome of greed, trust is becoming a rare commodity.

What happens when one of these Digital entities is included in a will?

What happens when one of these AI entities comments a crime or murder?

There is currently no clear legal framework governing who inherits digital assets.

The question is are we going to allow human intelligence be destroyed on the alter of silicon valley run by a few companies.

Silicon Valley calls it inevitable.

Your survival instinct knows better. Humanity is funding its own delete key (artificial superintelligence) — an unblinking intelligence that never sleeps, never stops, perfectly indifferent.

We must wake up.

When clicks and engagement drives profit, then it’s optimized for human addiction, not for being a tool to solve humanities problems.

We need to think about what ways we can cooperate rather than compete.

Get this shit under control before it even becomes a question.

We’re building a machine to let corporations do massive intellectual property theft and cut labor costs, and pretend that it’s okay because it’s inevitable.

And we have a media landscape that is willing to share scaremongering stories written by the liars claiming to have invented super intelligence,

Imagine a future where machines don’t just beat us at chess or write poetry but fundamentally outthink humanity in ways we can barely comprehend.

This isn’t science fiction – it’s a scenario that leading AI researchers believe could materialize within our lifetimes.

Artificial Superintelligence (ASI) – that could rewrite the rules of existence itself.

This recursive self-improvement could trigger an “intelligence explosion” – where AI systems become exponentially smarter at a pace we can’t match or control.

The potential benefits of superintelligent AI are as breathtaking as they are profound.

From curing diseases and reversing aging to solving global warming and unlocking the mysteries of quantum physics, ASI could help us overcome humanity’s greatest challenges.

But this same power could pose existential risks if not properly aligned with human values and interests.

As we stand on the brink of potentially the most significant technological leap in human history, our actions today will determine whether superintelligent AI becomes humanity’s greatest achievement or its last invention.

The challenge isn’t just technical – it’s philosophical, ethical, and fundamentally human. 

All human comments appreciated. All like clicks and abuse chucked in the bin.

Contact: bobdillon33&gmail.com

https://youtu.be/SLAzxmTkgDQ?si=Cv2a6z–CQRt5IHJ

https://youtu.be/cvyD1vChWF0?si=fonPejtm5qPYmFaQ

THE BEADY EYE SAYS., NONE OF US UNDERSTAND WHAT IS COMING WITH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE.

19 Thursday Feb 2026

Posted by in Artificial intelligence - AGI, Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , ,

( Seven minute read)

Yes you have a smart phone and yes there are massive amounts of money being invested in AI, but few of us understand what AI is doing or going to do to society.

Humans draw on norms, social expectations, emotional responses and culturally shaped intuitions about harm and fairness to think about morality.

Artificial intelligence has none of these.

Large language models can often match human responses but for reasons that bear no resemblance to human reasoning.

Unfortunately there is no reason and no way that a human mind can keep up with any artificial intelligence model.

When a generative AI system does something, we have no idea, at a specific or precise level, why it makes the choices it does.

This is not the AI we want.

It can and will destabilise trust not just in the capabilities of the model but in humans as a whole.

Its possible forthcoming progeny, artificial general intelligence — in ways that would benefit humanity, but also with the “tantalizing possibility” that researchers can finally figure out AI interpretability,

The moment you learned what their knowledge is actually made of—patterns in text rather than contact with the world—something essential like truth and trust without total transparency and accountability dissolved and disappeared.

We know that these large language models (LLMs) are imitating an understanding of the world that they don’t actually have—even if their fluency can make that easy to forget.

The model is not actually imagining anything or engaging in any deliberation, just reproducing patterns in how people talk or write about these counterfactuals.  Not an understanding of how events actually produce outcomes in the world.

Where a human evaluates, a model predicts. 

When a human engages with the world, a model engages with a distribution of words.

It does not give them access to the world those words refer to.

And yet, because human judgments are also expressed through language, the model’s answers often end up resembling human answers on the surface.

This gap between what models seem to be doing is becoming indistinguishable, to the observer, from knowledge itself.

The model cannot know when it is hallucinating, because it cannot represent truth in the first place. It cannot form beliefs, revise them or check its output against the world.

It cannot distinguish a reliable claim from an unreliable one except by analogy to prior linguistic patterns.

In short, it cannot do what judgment is fundamentally for.

People are already using these systems in contexts in which it is necessary to distinguish between plausibility and truth, such as law, medicine and psychology.

A model can generate a paragraph that sounds like a diagnosis, a legal analysis or a moral argument.

When we ask them to judge, we quietly redefine what judgment becomes—shifting it from a relationship between a mind and the world to a relationship between a prompt and a probability distribution.

So where are we in this new evolution?

We must treat large language models as sophisticated linguistic instruments that require human oversight precisely because they lack access to the domain that judgment ultimately depends on: the world itself.

Once artificial intelligence in what ever form it takes starts taking decisions without human intervention supervision and ability to be shuttled we human will become collateral damage.,

All human comments appreciated. All like clicks and abuse chucked in the bin.

Contact: bobdillon33@gmail.com

https://youtu.be/1g7YfskW_Fo?si=xotnucAbLRmimXBu

https://youtu.be/sNLbwWOo6UY?si=8bWL9P-PNUah3DvZ