( Seven minute read)
In the uk, immigrants are presently a very hot subject of debate due to the numbers arriving into the country both legally and illegally.
Because climate refugees will swam any system.
The first thing is to distinguish the difference between immigrants and refugees.
Refugees seek protection as they cannot safely return to their home countries. Immigrants, on the other hand, are people who choose to move to another country, often for reasons such as better economic opportunities, education, or family reunification.
With this in mind, the problem becomes how should get priority when applying for asylum.
The asylum process determines whether a person can remain in the UK because they have a “well-founded fear of persecution” in their home country.
Almost everyone who arrives by small boat claims asylum – they made up 41% of all asylum applications.
How does one determine the difference?
I suppose the word fleeing a war is the crux.
When the war is over should the refugees be sent home?
When the migrant application for asylum is approved how long should he or she be in the country before permanent residency is granted?
Should they be allowed to work and contribute to the country economy?
When should they be allowed to claim benefits?
Should they be house in holding camps?
Asylum hotels is expensive – costing £5.7m per day in 2024-25.
Should the residents tax payers foot the bill of their accommodation?
Should the uk cape the number of immigrants, this year the numbers are in the thousands.
The vast majority of UK immigration, however, is legal – this includes people who have been granted permission to come to work, study, claim asylum or for other authorised purposes.
Even the most basic calculations put the economic burden on the British taxpayer of an illegal migration population of 1.2 million at £14.4 billion.
That is just shy of 10% of NHS England’s budget for this year.
While they wait, most asylum seekers are not permitted to work, cannot choose where they live, and rely on government cash grants equivalent to £7 per day for food, sanitation and clothing.
Germany received the highest number of asylum applicants (127,730) in the EU+, followed by France (96,510).
When compared with the EU+ for the same period, the UK received the 4th largest number of applicants (44, 190 – including main applicants and dependents).
Majority of arrivals work in healthcare like NHS, lots of people work in education, & other critical occupations.
About 25% of the English population are in their 60th
Any growing economy need migration… That the sign of a successful country.
How to solve the problem.
Returns must be carried out faster.
Illegal migration must be reduced to become manageable. This can only be achieved by creating external entry points.
The challenges this involves are exacerbated when family members are allowed to immigrate subsequently to join beneficiaries of subsidiary protection.
People eligible for asylum must be distributed within the country and not allowed to gather in groups.
They must attended English speaking classes.
Applicants from safe countries of origin should be subject to strict residence restrictions and work bans during the asylum procedure.
Naturalisation cannot be fast-tracked; it must be the end-point of an integration process to avoid creating misguided incentives.
All human comments appreciated. All like clicks chucked in the bin.
Contact; bobdillon33@gmail.com
bobdillon33blog 